Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:23:59.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

R&D in Support of Repository Implementation Do We Need Any More?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Charles Mccombie*
Affiliation:
Nagra Wettingen, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

Is there any need for further scientific and technical development work in the field of waste management? Radically different views on this provocative question have been put forward by opposing sides in the nuclear debate. P. Slovik [1] quotes various leaders on the nuclear community who for years have been claiming that waste management has no unsolved technical problems. At the recent public hearing in England [2], on the other hand, Greenpeace and others convinced the Inspector that, despite a GBP 200 million site characterisation programme with many deep boreholes, UK-Nirex still knew too little about the deep hydrogeology to justify even the sinking of an exploratory shaft at Sellafield. Where does the truth lie?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Slovic, P.: Perceived Risk, Trust and Democracy; Risk Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1993 Google Scholar
[2] Cumbria County Council Appeal by United Kingdom Nirex Limited; File APP[H0900/A/94/247019Google Scholar
[3] McCombie, C.: Requirements for repository licensing – The implementer's perspective; Paper presented at the Joint CNRA/RWMC/CRPPH Workshop, Cordoba, January 1997 Google Scholar
[4] McCombie, C.: Research priorities – Are we tackling the most important problems in waste management?; in MRS Proceedings, 127, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, eds. Lutze, W. and Ewing, R., 1989 Google Scholar