Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:30:42.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rare Earth Materials Challenge to National Defense: Material Scientist’s Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2011

Shiva Hullavarad*
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Group, Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska
Nilima Hullavarad
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Group, Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska
Joclyn Cook
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Group, Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article provides the key technical niche that alternative rare earth metals and oxides can offer as an alternative to the ones that are under ‘Potential China Export Embargo’. The potential areas of national interest that affected by limited rare earth and the implications of such short supplies on the US businesses are discussed. The paper discusses the technology areas where US based academic and industries have an opportunity in developing the alternate rare earth materials (REM) through innovations in recycling existing rare earth (RE) metals/oxides and develop alternate solutions. Some examples are provided on how the nanotechnology research in the alternative material technologies in the rare earth metals and oxide materials significantly affect the industry trend of rare earth dependence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Undergraduate student

References

1. Cox, C., Industrial Minerals Company of Australia, Rare Earths: Facing New Challenges in the New Decade (2010)Google Scholar
3. Minerals, Critical Minerals and the US Economy, National Research Council, National Academies Press www.nap.edu/catalog/12034.html (2008)Google Scholar
4. Critical Materials Strategy, US Department of Energy, http://www.energy.gov/news/documents/criticalmaterialsstrategy.pdf (2010)Google Scholar
6. Grasso, V. B., Rare Earth Elements in National Defense: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress, Congressional Research Service (2010)Google Scholar
7. Gunnarsson, O. and Schonhammer, K., Photoemission from Ce Compounds: Exact Model Calculation in the Limit of Large Degeneracy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 604 (1983)Google Scholar
8. Borse, P.H., Kulkarni, S.K., Deshmukh, N. (Hullavarad), et al. , Luminescence Quenching in ZnS Nanoparticles due to Fe and Ni Doping, J. Mater. Sci. 34, 6087(1999).Google Scholar
9. Huili, L. Laser Absorbency of Samarium Borate Prepared by Solid-state Reaction, J. Rare Earth, 25, 3 (2007)Google Scholar
10. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Ed. David Lide, Edition 79 Google Scholar
11. Armitage, N.P., Fournier, P., Greene, R.L., Progress and perspectives on electron-doped cuprates, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 24212487(2010)Google Scholar
12. Long, K. R., Van Gosen, B. S., Foley, N. K., Cordier, D., The Principal Rare Earth Elements Deposits of the United States—A Summary of Domestic Deposits and a Global Perspective, http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5220/ Google Scholar