Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:39:35.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rapid Thermal Annealing of Fib-Implanted Ga Shallow Impurity Profiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

C-M. Lin
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Electronics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y. 121B1
A.J. Steckl
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Electronics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y. 121B1
T.P. Chow
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and Development Center, Schenectady, N.Y. 12301
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results of a study to fabricate shallow p+ n junction using Ga FIB implantation in conjunction with rapid thermal annealing (RTA). A focused 75 KeV ion beam with BO mA/cm2 current density and 0.5 μm beam diameter was used to implant Ga into (100) Si substrates at the doses from 1E13 to 5E15/cm2. The annealing temperature is from 600 °C to 1000 °C for various times, 10–30 sec. Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and spreading resistance profiling (SRP) were used to measure the implanted Ga atomic and carrier concentration depth profiles. As compared to the conventional broad beam (BB) implantation, the FIB implanted impurity concentration depth profile has a longer tail and thus a deeper p+n junction. The damage generated by the high dose rate implantation is possibly responsible for this phenomenon. The results of SRP measurements of the FIB as-implanted samples show no Scif-anneal ing occured during implantations. p+n diodes fabricated using FIB exhibit good junction properties: ideality factor of 1.1, reverse–bias leakage current of below 5 nA/cm2 at -IV, and breakdown voltage of about 35 V.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Wang, V., Ward, J.W., and Seliger, R.L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. vol.19, p1158, 1981.Google Scholar
2 Wagner, A., Solid State Technol. vol.26, p97, 1983.Google Scholar
3 Reuss, R.H., Morgan, D., GoIdenetz, A., Clark, W.M., Rensch, D.B., and Utlaut, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B4, p290, 1986.Google Scholar
4 Chu, S.D., Corelli, J.C., Steckl, A.J., Reuss, R.H., Clark, W.M. Jr. Rensch, D.B., and Morris, W.G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B4, p375, 1986.Google Scholar
5 Shukuri, S., Wada, Y., Hagiwara, T., Komori, K., and Tamura, M., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices,vol. ED–34, p1264, 1987.Google Scholar
6 Ghezzo, M., and Brown, D.M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 120, p 146, 1973.Google Scholar
7 Tamura, M., Shukuri, S., Ishitani, T., Ichkawa, M., and Doi, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23, L417, 1984.Google Scholar
8 Tamura, M., Shukuri, S., Moniwa, M., and Default, M., Appl. Phys. A 39, p183, 1986.Google Scholar
9 Bamba, Y., Miyauchi, E., Arimoto, H., Kuramoto, K., Takamori, A., and Hashimoto, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 24, L6, 1985.Google Scholar
10 Tsai, M.Y., Streetman, S.G., Deline, V.R., and Evans, C.A. Jr, Journal of Electronic Materials, vol.8, No.2, p 111, 1979.Google Scholar
11 Solecon Labs, private communication.Google Scholar
12 Harrison, H.B., Iyer, S.S., Si-Halasz, G.A., and Cohen, S.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51(13), p 992, 1987.Google Scholar