Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T23:11:34.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation Effect on the Viscosity of the Simple B2O3 Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. Barbu  and
G. Jaskierowicz
A. Barbu
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Solides Irradiés (CEA-CNRS), Ecole Polytechnique, 91128, PALAISEAU, cedex, FRANCE
G. Jaskierowicz
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Solides Irradiés (CEA-CNRS), Ecole Polytechnique, 91128, PALAISEAU, cedex, FRANCE
Get access

Abstract

The creep velocity of B203 glass fibers under irradiation with 2.5 MeV electrons at low flux ( around 5 1013 e-cm−2s−1) has been studied versus temperature. As under very high energy heavy ions irradiation (1.6 GeV argon), the viscosity is drastically reduced below 300°C. An important difference between the two kinds of irradiation is the occurrence of a compaction phenomenon at the beginning of electron irradiation experiments. The results can be understood by assuming two totally different mechanisms: a relaxation driven by melting of the glass along the path of the ions for very high energy heavy ion irradiations and a relaxation driven by individual radiation induced points defects for high energy electron irradiations.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 504: Symposium KK – Atomistic Mechanisms in Beam Synthesis & Irradiation… , 1997 , 117
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Mayer, G. and Leconte, L. J. Phys. Radium 21 (1960) 246 Google Scholar
[2] Barbu, A., Bibolé, M., Hazif, R. Le, Bouffard, S. and Ramillon, J. C. J. N. M. 165 (1989) 217 Google Scholar
[3] Biron, I. and Diffusion, A. Barbu and Defect Data 53–54 (1987) 477 Google Scholar
[4] Biron, I. and Barbu, A. Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B32 (1988) 279 Google Scholar
[5] Primak, W., Fuchs, L. H. and Day, P. Phys. Rev. 92 (1953) 1064 Google Scholar
[6] Primak, W. and Kampwirth, R. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 12 (1968) 5651Google Scholar
[7] Primak, W. J. Appl. Phys. 53 (1982) 7331 Google Scholar
[8] Zarzycki, J. and Naudin, F., Phys. Chem. Glasses 8 (1967) 11 Google Scholar
[9] Macedo, P. B. and Napolitano, A., J. Chem. Phys 49 (1968) 1887 Google Scholar
[10] Sizman, R., J. Nucl. Mat, 69 & 70 (1978) 386 Google Scholar
[11] Ryazanov, A. I., Volkov, A. E. and Klaumtinzer, S., Phys. Rev. B 51, 18 (1995) 12107Google Scholar
[12] Trinkaus, H. and Ryazanov, A. I., Phys. Rev. Let, 75, 25 (1995) 5072 Google Scholar
[13] Trinkaus, H., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B07 (1988) 155 Google Scholar