Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:02:18.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

R717 Glass Alteration in the Presence of Mortar: Effect of the Cement Grade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Z. Andriambololona
Affiliation:
Rhône Valley Nuclear Research Center, DPR/SCD, BP 171, F 30205 Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France
N. Godon
Affiliation:
Rhône Valley Nuclear Research Center, DPR/SCD, BP 171, F 30205 Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France
E. Vernaz
Affiliation:
Rhône Valley Nuclear Research Center, DPR/SCD, BP 171, F 30205 Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France
Get access

Abstract

R717 glass alteration was investigated in the presence of four mortars prepared from four different cement grades: “CPA” Portland cement (mortar M1), CPA with pozzolana additive (M2), CPA with amorphous silica additive (M3) and “CLK” blast furnace slag cement (M4). Glass specimens were also altered in Volvic mineral water and in a cement effluent. Glass corrosion in the cement media was greater than in Volvic water, but well below what could be expected from the high pH (approx 12.5). The relatively low alteration was probably related to the protective action of the calcium-enriched gel layer that formed at the glass surface. The glass corrosion rate was 2 to 3 times lower with cement containing pozzolana or silica gel additives or with CLK cement than with CPA cement alone.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Boult, K.A. et al. (1991), Radionuclide Release from Solidified High-Level Waste, Report EUR 13604.Google Scholar
2. Haworth, A., Sharland, S.M. and Tweed, C.J. (1989), “Modeling the Degradation of Cement in a Nuclear Waste Repository”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 127, 447454.Google Scholar
3. Shimann, A. (1983), J. Noncrystalline Solids, 54.Google Scholar
4. Ambroise, J., Murat, M. and Pera, J. (1985), “Durabilité des fibres de verre dans différents milieux cimentaires en cours de consolidation: Etude d'une fibre de verre E”. Verre Rifractaire, 39/6, 905910.Google Scholar
5. Glasser, L.S. Dent. and Kataoka, N. (1981), “The Chemistry of Alkali-Aggregate Reactions”, Conference: Cape Town, South Africa, March 30-April 3, 1981.Google Scholar
6. Grambow, B. (1985), “JSS-A Glass Dissolution: Mechanism, Model and Experiments”, SKB Tech. Report 87-02, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm.Google Scholar
7. Advocat, T., Crovisier, J.L., Vernaz, E., Ehret, G. and Charpentier, H. (1990), “Hydrolysis of Nuclear Waste Glass in Dilute Media: Mechanisms and Rate as a Function of pH”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 212, 5764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Grassi, G., Stafferi, L. and Badini, C. (1985), “E. Glass Fibers with Surface Coating: Reaction to Alkaline Attack”, Silicates Industriels, 11/12, 143148.Google Scholar