Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:53:20.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulsed Laser Deposition of NbNx (0 ≤ x ≤ 1.4) Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Randolph E. Treece
Affiliation:
National Research Council, Postdoctoral Research Associate.
James S. Horwitz
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Code 6674, Washington, D. C. 20375–5345.
Douglas B. Chrisey
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Code 6674, Washington, D. C. 20375–5345.
Get access

Abstract

The structure, morphology, and electrical properties of pulsed laser deposited NbNx (0 ≤ x ≤ 1.4) thin films have been investigated. Films were deposited from Nb metal targets on oriented MgO (100) and amorphous fused silica substrates as a function of substrate temperature and ambient pressure. A reducing atmosphere (N2 with 10% H2) was used to prevent oxide formation. At elevated temperatures, the N/Nb ratios of films deposited on MgO, as determined from Rutherford Backscattering Spectroscopy, increased from 0 −1.4 as the ambient pressure was varied from vacuum to 200 mTorr, respectively. NbNx films (x=l) were deposited at 600 °C and 60 mTorr. Both the structure and electrical properties of the deposited films varied strongly with the substrate type. On fused silica, NbN films were poorly crystalline with low critical temperatures (Tc ∼ 8 – 11 K) and low critical currents (Jc (4.2 K) ∼ 2 MA/cm2), whereas on MgO the NbN films were oriented and had better transport properties (Tc ∼ 16.4 K and Jc (4.2 K) = 7.1 MA/cm2).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Growth of electronic ceramics by PLD is reviewed in Horwitz, J. S., Chrisey, D. B., Grabowski, K. S. and Leuchtner, R. E., Surf. Coatings Technol. 51, 290 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Treece, R. E., Horwitz, J. S. and Chrisey, D. B., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. (1994) in press.;.F. Xiong and R.P.H. Chang, Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 285, 587 (1993).; C. Niu, Y.Z. Lu, and CM. Lieber, Science 261, 334 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Ballal, A. K., Salamanca-Riba, L., Doll, G. L., Yaylor, C. A. II and Clarke, R., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 285, 513 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Tiwari, P., Zheleva, T. and Narayan, J., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 285, 349 (1993).; V. Cracium, D. Cracium and I. W. Boyd, Mater. Sci. and Engin. B18, 178, (1993).Google Scholar
5. Wolf, S. A., Gubser, D. U., Francavilla, T. L. and Skelton, E. F., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18, 253 (1981).; E. J. Cukauskas, W. L. Carter and S. B. Qadri, J. Appl. Phys. 57, 2538 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Claassen, J. H., Reeves, M. E. and Soulen, R. J., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 996 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Lengauer, W., Surface and Interface Anal. 15, 377 (1990).Google Scholar