Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:27:28.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proton Irradiation Damage in Zn and Cd Doped InP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

George C. Rybicki  and
Wendell S. Williams
George C. Rybicki
Affiliation:
Photovoltaics Branch, NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135
Wendell S. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106
Get access

Abstract

Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy (DLTS) was used to study the defects introduced in Zn and Cd doped Schottky barrier diodes by 2 MeV proton irradiation. The defects H3, H4 and H5 were observed in lightly Zn doped InP, while only the defects H3 and H5 were observed in more heavily Zn doped and Cd doped InP. The defect activation energies and capture cross sections did not vary between the Zn and Cd doped InP.

The concentration of the radiation induced defects was also measured. The introduction rate of the defect H4 in the lightly Zn doped InP and the introduction rate of the defect H3 in the heavily Zn and Cd doped InP were about equal, but the introduction rate of the defect H5 varied strongly among the three types of material. The introduction rate of H5 was highest in the heavily Zn doped InP but the lowest in the heavily Cd doped InP, even though they were doped comparably. As a result, the total defect introduction rate was lowest in the highly Cd doped InP.

The results can be interpreted in terms of the models for the formation and annealing of defects, and by the different diffusion rates of Zn and Cd in InP.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 325: Symposium L – Physics and Applications of Defects in Advanced Semiconductors , 1993 , 311
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yamaguchi, M., Umera, C., and Yamamoto, A., Jpn. Appl. Phys., 23, 302 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Weinberg, I., Swartz, C. and Hart, R., Proc. of 18th IEEE PVSC., 723, (1985).Google Scholar
3. Sibile, A. and Bourgoin, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 956 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Sibile, A., Suski, J. and Gilleron, M., J. Appl. Phys, 60, 595 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Yamaguchi, M. and Ando, K., J. Appl. Phys., 60, 935 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Messenger, S., Walters, R. and Summers, G., J.Appl. Phys., 71, 4201 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Telia, A., Lepely, B. and Michael, C., J. Appl. Phys., 69, 7159 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Schroder, Deiter, Semiconductor Materials and Device Characterization, (John Wiley, NY, 1990), p. 310.Google Scholar
9. Zohta, Y. and Watanabe, M., J. Appl. Phys, 53, 1809 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Sibile, A. and Suski, J., Phys. Rev. B., 31, 5551 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Sibile, A., Phys. Rev. B., 35, 3929 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Chand, N. and Huston, P., J. Elec. Mater., 11, 37 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar