Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:13:57.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Proposed Model for the Thermal Conductivity of Dry And Water-Saturated Tuff*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

M. Moss  and
G. M. Haseman
M. Moss
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Thermophysical Properties Division 1824, P. O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185
G. M. Haseman
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Thermophysical Properties Division 1824, P. O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

The room-temperature thermal conductivities of two kinds of tuff from the Nevada Test Site have been measured on a linear-heat-flow thermal comparator. The results are the basis for an empirical model of the conductivity of these rocks in the dry and water-saturated conditions as a function of porosity. Tuff is one medium being considered for nuclear waste disposal. Devitrified, non-zeolitized tuffs with 6-22% porosity, and non-welded, zeolitized tuffs with 24-35% porosity were examined. The empirical geometric mean model is used to characterize the porosity-dependent thermal conductivity. We consider the rock matrix conductivity and the effective fluid conductivity as adjustable parameters in fitting the model to data for saturated and dehydrated samples, separately. For each rock type, the fitted value of matrix conductivity is the same in both the saturated and dehydrated cases; 2.3 and 1.1 W/(m.K) for the non-zeolitized and zeolitized tuffs, respectively. The fitted values for fluid conductivities are different for the the zeolitized and non-zeolitized tuffs, but the ratio of fitted water conductivity to fitted gas conductivity is very nearly the same for both rock types. This permits the use of a single equation to predict with good accuracy the ratio of saturated to dry rock conductivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 26: Symposium D – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII , 1983 , 967
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work performed at Sandia National Laboratories supported by the U. S. Department of Energy under Contract Number DE-ACO4-76DP00789.

References

REFERENCES

1. Progelhof, R. C., Throne, J. L., and Ruetsch, R. R., “Methods for Predicting the Thermal Conductivity of Composite Systems: A Review,” Polym. Eng. and Sci. 16, 615 (1976).10.1002/pen.760160905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Woodside, W. and Messmer, J. H., “Thermal Conductivity of Porous Media. II. Consolidated Rocks,” J. App. Phys. 32, 1699 (1961).10.1063/1.1728420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Moss, M., Koski, J. A., and Haseman, G. M., “Measurement of Thermal Conductivity by the Comparative Method,” Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 82-0109 (March 1982).Google Scholar
4. Bish, D. L., “Detailed Mineralogical Characterization of the Bullfrog and Tram Members in USW-Gl, with Emphasis on Clay Mineralogy,” Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-9021-MS (October 1981).10.2172/59125Google Scholar
5. Waters, A. C. and Carroll, P. R., Eds., “Preliminary Stratigraphic and Petrologic Characterization of Core Samples from USW-Gl, Yucca Mountain, Nevada,” Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-8840-MS (November 1981).10.2172/59127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Blacic, J. et al. , “Effects of Long-Term Exposure of Tuffs to High-Level Nuclear Waste-Repository Conditions: Preliminary Report,” Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-9174-PR (February 1982).10.2172/59135Google Scholar
7. Private communication from Lappin, A. R., Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
8. Private communication from Hadley, G. R., Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
9. Moss, M., Koski, J. A., and Lappin, A. R., “Thermal Conductivity of Tuff: The Effects of Composition, Porosity, Bedding-Plane Orientation, Water Content and a Joint,” ASME/JSME Thermal Engineering Joint Conf. Proc. 2, 199–204 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Memoranda to Lappin, A. R., Sandia National Laboratories, May 11 and July 26, 1982.Google Scholar
11. Touloukian, Y. S., Judd, W. R. and Roy, R. F., Eds., Physical Properties of Rocks and Minerals (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1981), Vol. II-2 of McGraw-Hill/CINDAS Data Series on Material Properties, Chap. 12, pp. 451–454.Google Scholar
12. Horai, K., “Thermal Conductivity of Rock-Forming Minerals,” J. Geophys. Res. 76, 1278 (1971).Google Scholar