Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:13:23.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of In Situ Reinforced Silicon Nitride Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C.-W. Li
Affiliation:
Allied-Signal Inc., Corporate Research and Technology, Morristown, NJ 07962, USA
J. Yamanis
Affiliation:
Allied-Signal Inc., Corporate Research and Technology, Morristown, NJ 07962, USA
P.J. Whalen
Affiliation:
Allied-Signal Inc., Corporate Research and Technology, Morristown, NJ 07962, USA
C.J. Gasdaska
Affiliation:
Allied-Signal Inc., Corporate Research and Technology, Morristown, NJ 07962, USA
C.P. Ballard
Affiliation:
Allied-Signal Inc., Corporate Research and Technology, Morristown, NJ 07962, USA
Get access

Abstract

In situ reinforced (ISR) silicon nitride ceramics have been developed to have microstructures that mimic the best whisker containing ceramic matrix composites. Large, interlocking needle-like grains of beta silicon nitride can be produced throughout these materials to create an isotropic, high-temperature ceramic with high fracture toughness (˜9 MPa√m), good high-temperature strength (4 Pt MOR = 750 MPa at 25°C and 500 MPa at 1375°C), high Weibull modulus (m >20), and low creep at high temperature. Since these materials do not rely on transforming metastable phase inclusions as a toughening mechanism, their fracture resistance is virtually insensitive to temperature. The high crack growth resistance of these ceramics also yields a material which is extremely defect tolerant. Residual MOR strengths of 300–400 MPa are typical after multiple 50-kg Vicker's indentations of the sample tensile surface. After abrasive particle impact, the biaxial strengths of the in situ reinforced ceramics are typically more than twice that of traditional, fine-grained silicon nitrides.

Unlike ceramic composites toughened using whisker additives, the in situ reinforcement approach to silicon nitride development does not require the use of complicated whisker dispersion techniques for green processing, nor is shape-limiting hot pressing required for densification during sintering.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Larsen, D.C. and Adams, J.W., ”Property Screening and Evaluation of Ceramic Turbine Materials”, Report No. AFWAL-TR -83-4141, ITT Research Insitutue, Chicago, IL, April 1984.Google Scholar
2. Batha, H.D. and Whitney, E.D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 56[7], 365–69 (1973).Google Scholar
3. Priest, H.F., Priest, G.L., and Gazza, G.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 60[1–2], 81 (1977).Google Scholar
4. Greskovich, C. and Prochazka, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64[7], C96–C97 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Greskovich, C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64[12], 725–30 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Tani, E., Nishijima, M., Ichinose, H., Kishi, K., and Umebayashi, S., Yogyo-Kyokaishi 94[2], 300–05 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Lange, F.F., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 62[12], 1369–74 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Shalek, P.D., Petrovic, J.J., Hurley, G.F., and Gac, F.D., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 65[2], 351–56 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Buljan, S.T., Baldoni, J.G., Huckabee, M.L., and Zilberstein, G., ”Microstructure and Fracture Toughness of Silicon Nitride Composites”, Whisker- and Fiber- Toughened Ceramics - Proceedings of an International Conference, pp. 113- 24, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 7–9 June 1988.Google Scholar
10. Corbin, N.D., Willkens, C.A., Pujari, V.K., Yeckley, R.L., and Mangaudis, M.J., ”The Influence of Reinforcement Orientation on the Toughness of Si3N4 Matrix Composites”, Whisker- and Fiber-Toughened Ceramics - Proceedings of an International Conferlence, pp. 131–37, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 7–9 June 1988.Google Scholar
11. Tani, E., Umebayashi, S., Kishi, K., Kobayashi, K., and Nishijima, M., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 65[9], 1311–15 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Jenkins, M.G., Kobayashi, A.S., White, K.W., and Bradt, R. C., Int. J. Fract. 34, 281–95 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Salem, J.A. and Shannon, J.L. Jr., J. Mater. Sci. 22 321–24 (1987).Google Scholar
14. Li, C.-W. and Yamanis, J., Ceramic Eng. Sci. Proc. 10[7–8], 632 (1989).Google Scholar
15. Ritter, J.E., Choi, S.R., Jakus, K., Whalen, P., and Rateick, R.G. Jr., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 5543–46 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Wiederhom, S.M., Roberts, D.E., Chuang, T. J., and Chuck, L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71[7], 602–8 (1988).Google Scholar
17. Lange, F.F., Siebeneck, H.J., and Hasselman, D.P.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 59, 454 (1976).Google Scholar
18. Swanson, P.L., Fairbanks, C.J., Lawn, B.R., Mai, Y.-W., and Hockey, B.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 279–89 (1987).Google Scholar
19. Whalen, P.J., Gasdaska, C.J., and Silvers, R.D., Ceramic Eng. Sci. Proc. 11[7–8], 633 (1990).Google Scholar
20. Li, C.-W., Behi, M., and Yamanis, J., ”Thermal Shock Resistance of High Toughness and Thermal Conductivity Si3N4”, presented at the 92nd Annual American Ceramic Society Meeting, Dallas, TX, April 1990 Google Scholar