Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-01T13:34:54.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of Image Sensor Structure Obtained Below 120°C On The Foil By Reactive Magnetron Sputtering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. Kolodziej
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, University of Mining and Metallurgy, al.Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland, [email protected]
P. Krewniak
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, University of Mining and Metallurgy, al.Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
R. Tadeusiewicz
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, University of Mining and Metallurgy, al.Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Get access

Abstract

Polyimide substrates are of interest because of their thermal stability, light weight, and good mechanical characteristics. This paper reports thermal control multilayer deposition experiments which have strongly affected the properties of the image sensor structure (TFT + photodiode). Particularly TFT properties have been studied with respect to difficulties of obtaining of good quality a-SiNx:H films at temperature below 120°C. We characterize the structural properties using infrared absorption, refractive index measurements, small angle x-ray diffraction and the optoelectrical measurements of the TFT and PIN diode structure. The linear image sensor consisting of two rows, 40 pixels per row, with dimensions 0.6 mm2was made on the polyimide foil.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nath, P., Vogeli, C., Hoffman, K., Laarman, T., Solar Energy Materials, 23, 1991, pp. 297302.Google Scholar
2. Shinohara, H., Abe, M., Nishi, K., Arai, Y., Ist IEEE WCPEC, 1994, pp.682-685Google Scholar
3. Kang, Y.S., Esho, P., Knipe, R., Tregilgas, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., 436, 1997, pp. 3540.Google Scholar
4. Huang, J.R., Lee, Y., Toporow, C.M.C., Vendura, G.J., Jackson, T.N., Wronski, C.R., Proc. of 261h IEEE PVSC, September 1997.Google Scholar
5. Harris, F.W., in: Wilson, D., Stenzenberger, H.D., Hergenrother, P.M. (Eds.), Polyimides, Blackie and Son, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
6. McCormick, C.S., Weber, C.E., Abelson, J.R., Davis, G.A., Weiss, R.E., Aebi, V., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15 (5), 1997.Google Scholar
7. Kolodziej, A., Nowak, S., Krewniak, P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 452, 913 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Kolodziej, A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 185, 168 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Langford, A.A., Fleet, M.L., Nelson, B.P., Langford, W.A., Maley, N., Phys. Rev. B 45, 13 367 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Weisfield, R.L., Street, R.A., Apte, R.B., Moore, A., The Physics of Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, 3032, 14, 1997.Google Scholar
11. Street, R.A., Wu, X.D., Weisfield, R., Ready, S., Apte, R., Ngyuen, M., Jackson, W.B., Nylen, P., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 198–200 (1996) 11511154.Google Scholar