Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:51:12.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Projectile Mass Dependence of the Amorphization Process and the Critical Temperature in the Ion Irradiated CuTi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

J. Koike ,
P. R. Okamoto  and
M. Meshii
J. Koike
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Northwestern University, Evanston,IL. 60208
P. R. Okamoto
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.60439
M. Meshii
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Northwestern University, Evanston,IL. 60208
Get access

Abstract

CuTi was irradiated with 1MeV Ne+ and Kr+ at various temperatures in the Argonne-HVEM interfaced to a tandem accelerator. The integrated intensity of diffuse ring was measured by a microdensitometer and analyzed by Gibbons model for the dose dependence of the amorphous volume. The results indicate that the direct amorphization occurs in a single damage zone with Kr+, but the overlapping of three damage zones is necessary with Ne+. The critical temperature for amorphization was 401±22K for Ne+ and 543±20K for Kr+, respectively. With Kr+, the critical temperature was nearly equal to the thermal crystallization temperature of an amorphous zone embedded in the crystalline matrix. Using the present observations, the relation between the amorphization process and the critical temperature is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 100: Symposium – A Fundamentals of Beam-Solid Interactions and Transient Thermal Processing , 1988 , 57
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Swanson, M. L., Parsons, J. R., and Hoelke, C. W., Rad. Effects 9, 249 (1971)Google Scholar
(2) Thompson, D. A. and Walker, R.S., Rad. Effects 36, 91 (1978)Google Scholar
(3) Baranova, E. C., Gusev, V.M., Martynenko, Y.V., Starinin, C.V., and Haibullin, I. B., Rad. Effects 25, 157 (1975)Google Scholar
(4) Howe, L. M., Rainville, M.H., Haugen, H.K., and Thompson, D.A., Nucl. Inst. and Methods 170, 419 (1980)Google Scholar
(5) Morehead, F. F. Jr. and Crowder, B. L., Rad. Effects 6, 27 (1970)Google Scholar
(6) Gibbons, J. F., Proc. of IEEE 60, 1062 (1972)Google Scholar
(7) Dennis, J. R. and Hale, E.B., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 1119 (1978)Google Scholar
(8) Jaouen, C., Delafond, J., and Riviere, J. P., J. Phys. F : Met. Phys. 17, 335 (1987)Google Scholar
(9) Simonen, E. P., Nucl. Inst. and Methods B 16, 198 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Brimhall, J. L., Kissinger, H. E., and Pelton, A. R., Rad. Effects 90, 241 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Parkin, D. M. and Elliott, R. O., Nucl. Inst. and Methods B16, 193 (1986)Google Scholar
(12) Moine, P., Riviere, J. P., Ruault, M. O., Chaumont, J., Pelton, A. R. and Sinclair, R., Nucl. Inst. and Methods B7/8, 20 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Woo, O. T., J. Nucl. Mater. 125, 120 (1984)Google Scholar
(14) Biersack, J. P. and Haggmark, L. G., Nucl. Inst. and Methods 174, 257 (1980)Google Scholar
(15) Luzzi, D. E., Mori, H., Fujita, H., and Meshii, M., Acta Met. 34, 629 (1986)Google Scholar
(16) Koike, J., Luzzi, D. E., Meshii, M., and Okamoto, P. R., MRS Conference Proceeding 74, 425 (1987)Google Scholar
(17) Averback, R. S., Benedek, R., and Merkle, K. L., Phys. Rev. B 18, 4156 (1978)Google Scholar
(18) Jenkins, M. L. and Wilkens, M., Phil. Mag. 34, 1155 (1976)Google Scholar
(19) Marshall, A. F., Lee, Y. S., and Stevenson, D. A., Acta Met. 35, 61 (1987)Google Scholar
(20) Grzeta, B., Stubicar, M., Cowlam, N., and Trojko, R., Phil. Mag.A 55, 227 (1987)Google Scholar