Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:26:13.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probing Confining Geometries with Molecular Diffusion: A Revisited Analysis of NMR-PGSE Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Stéphane Rodts
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées, Ministére de l'Equipement, Paris, FRANCE
Pierre Levitz
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherches sur la Matiére Divisée, CNRS, Orléans, FRANCE
Get access

Abstract

We present an interpretation of the self diffusion propagator for a molecular fluid confined in a porous medium. Breaking with conventional routes of interpretation, we focus in reciprocal space on the time dependence of the propagator at a fixed wave vector q. New theoretical results are reported, as well as NMR measurements on a water-saturated packing of glass beads and on a stack of plastic platelets with rough surfaces. It is shown that at least three time regimes may be distinguished, characteristic of new ways in which the propagator is affected by the geometry of the system: a short-time exponential regime of almost unrestricted diffusion, a pseudo-exponential regime probing the transport process across the material at the length scale λ=2π/q, and an algebraic regime at long times with exponent -d/2, where d is the dimensionality of connected parts of the pore space.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stejskal, E.O., Tanner, J.E., J. Chem. Phys., 42, 288292 (1965).Google Scholar
2. Mitra, P.P., Sen, P.N., Schwartz, L.M., Le Doussal, P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, n° 24, 3555, (1992).Google Scholar
3. Mitra, P.P., Physica A, 241, 122127 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Sen, P.N., Hurlimann, M.D., De Swiet, T.M., Phys. Rev. B, 51, n° 1, 601604 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Callaghan, P.T., Coy, A., Mac Gowan, D., Packer, K., Zelaya, F., Nature, 351, 467469 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Rodts, S., Levitz, P., accepted in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Google Scholar
7. Hills, B.P., Manoj, P., Destruel, C., Magn. Res. Imag., 18, 319333 (2000)Google Scholar
8. Lever, D.A., Bradbury, M.H., Hemingway, S.J., Journal of Hydrology, 80, 4576 (1985).Google Scholar