Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T13:13:42.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation and Characterization of Y3Al5O12 (YAG) from An Alkoxide-Derived Polymer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Zhiping Jiang
Affiliation:
Ceramics Processing Research Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139
Wendell E. Rhine
Affiliation:
Ceramics Processing Research Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

The controlled hydrolysis of Al(O-sec-Bu)3 and Y(O-iso-Pr)3 or the reaction of Y(OOCCH)3 with partially hydrolyzed Al(O-sec-Bu)3 [AlO0.75(O-sec-Bu)1.5] resulted in the formation of soluble polymeric materials. Pyrolysis of these materials under a flow of oxygen led to the formation of yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) at 650-1500°C. YAG was the only crystalline phase observed during pyrolysis, and the Al/Y ratio of the pyrolysis products and the starting material was identical. However, infrared spectroscopy indicated that carbonate groups and entrained CO2 existed in the products at temperatures up to 1250°C. The pyrolysis chemistry of the precursors and the microstructure of the products were studied by FT-IR, TGA, XRD, SEM and elemental analyses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Washio, K., Materials Chemistry and Physics 31, 57 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Takeshi, T. and David, L.D., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 65, 1282 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Cockayne, B., J. Less-Comm. Metal 114, 199 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Haneda, H., Watanabe, A., Matsuda, S., Sakai, T., Shirasaki, S. and Yamamura, H., “Sintering of Yttrium Aluminum Garnet,” Sintering 87, Sympomiya, Shimada, M., Yoshimura, M. and Watanabe, R., eds., Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, Essex, England, p. 381 (1988)Google Scholar
5. With, G. de and Dijk, H.J.A. van, Mat. Res. Bull. 19, 1669 (1984)Google Scholar
6 Messier, D.R. and Gazza, G.E., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 51, 692 (1972).Google Scholar
7. Apte, P., Burke, H. and Pickup, H., J. Mater. Res. 7, 706 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Yamaguchi, O., Takeoka, K. and Hayashida, A., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 101 (1991).Google Scholar
9. McKittrick, J., Kinsman, K., Connell, S., Sluzky, K. and Hesse, K., Ceramic Transactions Vol 26, 1723 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Vrolijk, J.W.G.A., Willems, J.W.M.M. and Metselaar, R., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 6,47 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Inoue, M., Otsu, H., Kominami, H. and Inui, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 1452 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Gurkovich, S.R. and Blum, J.B., in “Ultrastructure Processing of Ceramics, Glass, and Composites” Ed. by Hench, L.L. and Ulrich, D.R.; 1984, pp. 152160.Google Scholar
13. Sherif, F.G., Materials Science and Engineering B10, 59 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Yoldas, B.E., J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 38, 81 (1980).Google Scholar
15. Gopalakrishnamurthy, H.S., Rao, M. Subba and Narayanan, T.R. Kutty, Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 37, 891 (1975).Google Scholar
16. Djuricic, B., Kolar, D. and Memic, M., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 9, 75 (1992).Google Scholar