Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:09:49.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation and Characterization of Insulating Polyphenylene Oxide Films on Platinum Electrodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Margaret E. Langmuir
Affiliation:
Covalent Associates, Inc., 52 Dragon Court, Woburn, MA 01801
V. R. Koch
Affiliation:
Covalent Associates, Inc., 52 Dragon Court, Woburn, MA 01801
Get access

Abstract

Polyphenylene oxide (PPO) polymer films were electrogenerated on Pt substrates from solutions of o-allylphenol (OAP), 2-allyl-4-methylphenol (2A4MP), and 2-allyl-6-methylphenol (2AGMP). Relatively thick (l–20μm) films of the corresponding PPO films were generated from 50 v/o methanol/water solutions of the monomers or at low phenol:KOH concentration ratios. The film thickness depended on the maximum anodic potential to which the electrode was cycled. Films prepared from these solutions were found to be microporous with respect to ion permeability, allowing the oxidation of Br and reduction of Fe3+ to take place at the Pt surface. Competing oxidation of methoxide ion was found to be the cause of the film porosity and thickening.

On the other hand, thin (500–1000Å) coherent insulating films which were impervious to Br and Fe3+ ions could be deposited from aqueous KOH solutions and from methanolic solutions at high phenol:KOH concentration ratios. The thin films were found to decrease the diffusion rates of hydronium and hydrox hydroxide ions to the electrode surface to a significant degree. As a result, the filmed electrodes could be cycled in neutral saline between +1.5 and −0.2 V vs. SCE with no damage to the film.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Guyton, D.L. and Hambrecht, F.T., Med. and Biol. Eng. 7, 613 (1974) and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hambrecht, F.T., Ann. Otol. Rhinol and Laryngol. 88, 729 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Caldwell, C.W. and Reswick, J.B., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr. 429 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Nichols, M.F., Hahn, A.W., James, W.J., Sharma, A.K., Yasuda, H.K., Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference IEEE/EMBS, “Frontiers of Engineering in Health Care”, 529 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Mengoli, G., Daolio, S., Giulio, U., Folonari, C., J. Applied Electrochem. 9, 483 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Mengoli, G., Daolio, S., Musiani, M.M., J. Applied Electrochem.. 10, 459 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Mengoli, G., Bianco, P., Daolio, S., Munari, M.T., J. Electrochem. Soc. 128, 2276 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bruno, F., Pham, M.C., Dubois, J. E., Electrochim. Acta 22, 451 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Pham, M.C., Dubois, J.E., Lacaze, P.C., J. Electroanal. Chem. 99, 331 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Dubois, J.E., Lacaze, P.C., Pham, M.C., J. Electroanal. Chem. 117, 233 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Pham, M.C., Lacaze, P.C., Dubois, J.E., J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 777 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Bejerano, T. and Gileadi, E., J. Electroanal. Chem. 38, 137 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Iwakura, C., Hayashi, T., Kikkawa, S., Tamura, H., Electrochim. Acta 17, 1085 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Golden, W.G. and Saperstein, D.D. et al., J. Phys. Chem. 88, 574 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar