Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:48:44.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary Results of the Use of Hydroxyapatite as a Consolidant for Carbonate Stones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2011

Enrico Sassoni
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e dei Materiali, Università di Bologna, via Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy
Sonia Naidu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Princeton University, Eng. Quad. E-226, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
George W. Scherer
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Eng. Quad. E-319, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Get access

Abstract

The effectiveness of using hydroxyapatite (HAP) as a consolidant for carbonate stones was evaluated. HAP was chosen as a consolidating agent since it is notably less soluble than calcite and has a similar crystal structure and a close lattice match to it. Among possible methods for forming HAP, the reaction between the calcite of the stone and a solution of diammonium hydrogen phosphate (DAP) in mild conditions was chosen. Indiana Limestone samples, artificially damaged by heating to 300°C for 1 hour, were treated with a 1 molar DAP solution by partial immersion and capillary absorption for 48 hours or by brushing until apparent refusal and wrapping with a plastic film for 48 hours. After washing in deionized water for 3 days and drying under a fan at room temperature until constant weight, the improvements in dynamic elastic modulus and tensile strength were evaluated. The formation of calcium phosphate phases was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the phase characterization performed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD). The water absorption modification after the consolidating treatment was then assessed. Results show that treated samples experienced significant increases in dynamic elastic modulus and tensile strength, as a consequence of crack reduction and pore filling consequent to HAP deposition at grain boundaries. The sorptivity of the treated samples is reduced by 26-44% (based on treatment technique), so that water and water vapor exchanges with the environment are not blocked.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Winkler, E.M., Stone in architecture – Properties, durability (Springer, New York, 1997)Google Scholar
2. Daniele, V., Taglieri, G., Quaresima, R., J Cult Herit 9, 294301 (2008)Google Scholar
3. Scherer, G.W., Wheeler, G.S., Key Engineering Materials 391, 125 (2009)Google Scholar
4. Wheeler, G., Mendez-Vivar, J., Goins, E.S., Fleming, S.A., Brinker, C.J., in Proceedings of 9th Int. Con. on the Deterioration and Conservation of Stone (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000) pp. 541545 Google Scholar
5. Favaro, M., Mendichi, R., Ossola, F., Russo, U., Simon, S., Tomasin, P., Vigato, P.A., Polym Degrad Stabil 91, 30833096 (2006)Google Scholar
6. Vicini, S., Margutti, S., Moggi, G., Pedemonte, E., J Cult Herit 2, 143147 (2001)Google Scholar
7. Cappitelli, F., Principi, P., Pedrazzani, R., Toniolo, L., Sorlini, C., Sci Total Environ 385, 172181 (2007)Google Scholar
8. Dorozhkin, S.V., Materials 2, 399498 (2009)Google Scholar
9. Lide, D.R. (Ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (The Chemical Rubber Co., 1999)Google Scholar
10. Boivin, G., Medicographia 29, 126132 (2007)Google Scholar
11. Skinner, A.J., LaFemina, J.P., Hansen, H.J.F., Am Mineral 79, 205214 (1994)Google Scholar
12. Mathew, M., Takagi, S., J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 106, 10351044 (2001)Google Scholar
13. Maslen, E.N., Streltsov, V.A., Streltsova, N.R., Ishizawa, N., Acta Crystallogr B 51, 929939 (1995)Google Scholar
14. Kamiya, M., Hatta, J., Shimida, E., Ikuma, Y., Yoshimura, M., Monma, H., Mater Sci Eng B 111, 226231 (2004)Google Scholar
15. Johnsson, M.S.A., Nancollas, G.H., Crit Rev Oral Bio M 3, 6182 (1992)Google Scholar
16. Siegesmund, S., Ullemeyer, K., Weiss, T., Tschegg, E.K., Int J Earth Sci 89, 170182 (2000)Google Scholar
17. Weiss, T., Siegesmund, S., Fuller, E. R. Jr., Build Environ 38, 12511260 (2003)Google Scholar
18. Miliani, C., Velo-Simpson, M.L., Scherer, G.W., J Cult Herit 8, 16 (2007)Google Scholar
19. Sassoni, E., Naidu, S., Scherer, G.W., J. Cult. Herit., in proofGoogle Scholar