Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:28:51.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction of the Weathering Properties of Minerals Based on the Ion-Ion Interaction Potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Slavica Raicevic
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Sciences VINCA, Radiation and Environmental Protection Laboratory, P.O. Box 522, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro, [email protected]
Judith V. Wright
Affiliation:
PIMS NW, Inc., 201 North Edison, Suite 226, Richland, WA 99336, U.S.A., [email protected]
Jasmina Vujic
Affiliation:
University of California, Department of Nuclear Engineering, 4105 Etcheverry Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A., [email protected]
James L. Conca
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, 115 North Main Street, Carlsbad, NM 88220, U.S.A., [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Selection of solid matrix for immobilization of nuclear waste and of geological sites for its disposal represents a complex and consuming task. Previously, we demonstrated that the ion-ion interaction potential (IIIP), representing the main term of the cohesive energy, can be used for estimation of stability of solid matrix/impurity systems. Here we demonstrated a strong correlation between the weathering properties of minerals and their IIIP. Based on these results we proposed a simple theoretical criterion which can be used for assessment of the long term stability of solid matrix for immobilization of radioactive and toxic metals. This criterion was applied in analysis of stability of autunites and some possible practical consequences of results obtained for immobilization of uranium by apatite are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kowalewski, M. and Rimstidt, J.D., J. Geol. 111, 427 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Shevade, A.V., Erickson, L., Pierzynski, G. and Jiang, S., J. Hazard. Sub. Res. 3, 1 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Raicevic, S., Plecas, I., Lalovic, D.I. and Veljkovic, V. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, edited by Wronkiewicz, D.J. and Lee, J.H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 556, Boston, MA, 1999) pp. 135142.Google Scholar
4. Raicevic, S., Lalovic, D.I. and Veljkovic, V., Yu. Patent No. P269/97 (25 June 1997).Google Scholar
5. Alonso, J.A. and March, N.H., Electrons in Metals and Alloys, (Academic Press, London, 1989).Google Scholar
6. Harrison, W.A., Pseudopotentials in the Theory of Metals, (Benjamin, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
7. Veljkovic, V. and Slavic, I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 105 (1972).Google Scholar
8. Veljkovic, V., Phys. Lett. 45A, 41 (1973).Google Scholar
9. Bostick, W.D., Stevenson, R.J., Jarabek, R.J. and Conca, J.L., Adv. Environ. Res. 3, 488 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Lu, N., Xu, H., Wright, J. and Conca, J.L., “PIMS - Remediation of Metal-Contaminated Groundwater and Soil Using a Special Reactive Form of the Mineral Apatite,” in Applied Mineralogy in Research, Economy, Technology, Ecology and Culture, edited by Rammlmair, J. Mederer Oberthür, Th., Heimann, R.B. and Pentinghaus, H. (A.A.Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, Vol. 2, 2001) pp. 603606.Google Scholar
11. Murakami, T., Ohnuki, T., Isobe, H. and Sato, T., Am. Mineral. 82, 888 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Jerden, J.L. and Sinha, A.K., Applied Geochem. 18, 823 (2003).Google Scholar