Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:46:40.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Precipitation Kinetics in Metastable Solid Solutions – Theoretical Considerations and Application to Cu-Ti Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

R. Kampmann
Affiliation:
GKSS-Forschungzentrum, Institut für Physik D-2054 Geesthacht, FR Germany
H. Eckerlebe
Affiliation:
GKSS-Forschungzentrum, Institut für Physik D-2054 Geesthacht, FR Germany
R. Wagner
Affiliation:
GKSS-Forschungzentrum, Institut für Physik D-2054 Geesthacht, FR Germany
Get access

Abstract

Cu-2.9 at.% Ti single crystals were homogenized at various temperatures (780 °C ≤ TH ≤ 960°C) and quenched. Subsequent isothermal aging at 350 °C led to phase separation, the kinetics of which have been followed by employing small-angle neutron scattering (SANS). According to comple-mentary transmission electron and analytical field ion microscopy studies, the resulting transformation products of this first order phase transition are stoichiometrically ordered ellipsoidal Cu4Ti particles, the aspect ratio of which changes with aging time (t) as revealed by two-dimensional SANS-detection. In the early stages of phase separation, the decomposition kinet-ics are strongly influenced by the quenching rate via quenched-in excess vacancies. During aging the structure factor S(K,t) develops a maximum, the height (Sm) of which increases and the position (Km) of which decreases with t. Neither Sm(t) nor Km(t) follow a power law as predicted by several recent theories on spinodal decomposition. On the other hand, the time evolution of the mean Ti-rich cluster size (R), their number density (Nv), and the supersaturation (Δc) as inferred from the SANS-data and the diffuse Laue-scattering, are well predicted by a precipitation model which describes nucleation, growth and coarsening as competing processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, H. B., Fainstain, D., and Kotler, G. R. (1970). J. Appl. Phys. 41, 4404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckerlebe, H., Kampmann, R., and Wagner, R. (1986). In “Proc. Atomic Transport and Defects in Metals by Neutron Scattering” (Richter, Ch. Janot, D., and Springer, T., eds), p. 66. Springer- Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampmann, R., and Wagner, R. (1984). In “Decomposition of Alloys: the early stages” (Haasen, P., Gerold, V., Wagner, R., and Ashby, M., eds.), p. 91. Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, J. S., and Schwartz, A. J. (1980). Phys. Rev. A21, 948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifshitz, I. M., and Slyozov, V. V. (1961). Phys. Chem. Sol. 19, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, K. C. (1970). In “Phase Transformations”, Chapter6, p. 219, ASM Metals Park, Ohio.Google Scholar
v. Alvensleben, L., and Wagner, R. (1984). In “Decomposition of Alloys: the early stages” (Haasen, P., Gerold, V., Wagner, R., and Ashby, M., eds.), p. 143. Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, C. (1961). Z. Elektrochem. 65, 581.Google Scholar