Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:30:10.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential for the Rapid Transport of Plutonium In Groundwater as Demonstrated By Core Column Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D.R. Champ ,
W.F. Merritt  and
J.L. Young
D.R. Champ
Affiliation:
The Cnalk River Nuclear Laboratories Atomic Energy of Canada LimitedChalk River, Ontario Canada, K0J 1J0
W.F. Merritt
Affiliation:
The Cnalk River Nuclear Laboratories Atomic Energy of Canada LimitedChalk River, Ontario Canada, K0J 1J0
J.L. Young
Affiliation:
The Cnalk River Nuclear Laboratories Atomic Energy of Canada LimitedChalk River, Ontario Canada, K0J 1J0
Get access

Extract

The mobility of radionuclides in groundwater flow systems can be significantly altered by processes such as complexation, sorption on particulates, or hydrolysis, precipitation and the formation of colloids. Such processes provide potentially significant pathways for transport of radionuclides in the biosphere. Previous soil column studies demonstrated that radiocesium could be transported by particulates and that the process was likely mediated by micro-organisms. That observation provided a plausible mechanism to explain the anomalously rapid transport of small amounts of cesium-137 released from glass blocks buried below the water table at the Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 11: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management V , 1981 , 745
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Champ, D.R. and Merritt, W.F. (1981) in Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society, McDonnell, F.N. ed., pp 66–69.Google Scholar
2. Walton, F.B. and Merritt, W.F. (1980) in The Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. II, Plenum Press, pp 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Wildung, R.E., Garland, T.R., and Cataldo, D.A. (1979) in Biological Implications of Radionuclides Released from Nuclear Industries, IAEA, Vienna, Vol. II, pp 319–334.Google Scholar
4. Garland, T.R., and Wildung, R.E. (1977) in Biological Implications of Metals in the Environment, CONF–750929, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, pp 254–263.Google Scholar
5. Barnes, I. (1964) U.S. Geol. Surv. Water-Supply Paper 1535-H.Google Scholar
6. Foti, S.C., and Freiling, E.C. (1964) Talanta, II, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Schindler, J.E., and Alberts, J.J. (1974) Arch. Hydrobiol. 74, 4, 429.Google Scholar
8. Avogadro, A., Murray, C.N., and De Plano, A. (1979) in The Migration of Long-Lived Radionuclides in the Geosphere, OECD, pp 137–146.Google Scholar
9. Allard, B., Kipatsi, H., and Liljenzin, J.O. (1980) J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 42, 1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar