Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T23:05:21.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postbuckled Square Thin Film Membranes Under Differential Pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Torsten Kramer  and
Oliver Paul
Torsten Kramer
Affiliation:
IMTEK, Microsystem Materials Laboratory, University of Freiburg Georges-Köhler-Allee 103, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany [email protected]
Oliver Paul
Affiliation:
IMTEK, Microsystem Materials Laboratory, University of Freiburg Georges-Köhler-Allee 103, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We report quantitative results on the load-deflection response of compressively prestressed square membranes under differential pressure. The membranes consist of 0.485 μm and 1.9 μm thick silicon nitride films. For these square membranes we observed a new symmetry transition of the deflection profile between a state without reflection symmetries at small loads to a state with reflection symmetries at sufficiently large loads. The load-deflection response was modeled by finite element simulations covering a wide range of prestrains e0 and pressures using various geometries. From the symmetry transition process, Young's modulus E = (150±5) GPa and the prestrain ε0 = (1.6±0.1) 10-3 of the membrane material was extracted.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 695: Symposium L – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties IX , 2001 , L3.4.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tabata, O., Kawahata, K., Sugiyama, S., Igarashi, I., Sensors and Actuators A 20 (1989) 135–141.Google Scholar
2. Ziebart, V., Paul, O., Baltes, H., J. Microelectromech. Syst. 8 (1999) 423–432.Google Scholar
3. Fang, W., J. Micromech. Microeng. 9 (1999) 230–235.Google Scholar
4. Choi, B., Lovell, E. G., J. Micromech. Microeng. 7 (1997) 24–29.Google Scholar
5. Guckel, H., Burns, D., Rutigliano, C., Lovell, E., Choi, B., J. Micromech. Microeng. 2 (1992) 86–95.Google Scholar
6. Kramer, T., Paul, O., Sensors and Actuators A 92 (2001) 292–298.Google Scholar
7. Vlassak, J. J., Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 7 (1992) 3242–3249.Google Scholar
8. Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M., Theory of elasticity, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1986, §§ 13,14.Google Scholar
9. Pan, J. Y., Lin, P., Maseeh, F., Senturia, S. D., Techn. Digest of the Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, (1990) 70–73.Google Scholar