Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:28:25.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polymer-Clay Nanocomposite Materials: Solution and Bulk Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Gudrun Schmidt
Affiliation:
Polymers Division and Center for Neutron Research National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Alan I. Nakatani
Affiliation:
Polymers Division and Center for Neutron Research National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Paul D. Butler
Affiliation:
Polymers Division and Center for Neutron Research National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Vincent Ferreiro
Affiliation:
Polymers Division and Center for Neutron Research National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Alamgir -Karim
Affiliation:
Polymers Division and Center for Neutron Research National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Charles C. Han
Affiliation:
Polymers Division and Center for Neutron Research National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Get access

Abstract

The influence of shear on viscoelastic polymer-clay solutions was investigated by means of small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) under shear. SANS measured the shearinduced orientation of polymer and platelets. With increasing shear rate an anisotropic scattering pattern developed. At higher shear rates, the scattering anisotropy increases due to the increased orientation of the clay platelets in the shear field. Cessation of shear leads to fast recovery demonstrating the system to be highly elastic. As a result of drying, these solutions produce translucent nanocomposite films with a microporous membrane character. Depending on the preparation and degree of polymer-clay film dispersion, it is possible to modify the morphology and elastic properties of nanocomposite materials. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) reveals the network character and the development of morphology as a function of polymer concentration. Preliminary SANS experiments on the films will be correlated to morphologies obtained from AFM.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mourchild, A., Delville, A., Lambard, J., Lecolier, E., Levitz, P., Langmuir, 1942 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Hanley, H. J. M., Straty, G. C., Tsvetkov, F., Langmuir, 3362 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Pignon, F., Magnin, A., Piau, J. M., J. Rheol. 42, 1349 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Lan, T., Pinnavaia, T., J. Chem. Mater., 2216 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Wang, Z., Pinnavaia, T., J. Chem. Mater., 1820 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Usuki, A., Kawasumi, M., Kujima, Y., Okada, A., J. Mater. Res. 8, 1174 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Kojima, Y.et al., J. Mater. Res. 8, 1179 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Vaia, R. A., Structural Characterization of Polymer Layered Silicate Nanocomposites. Pinnavaia, T. J., Beal, G. W., Ed., Polymer-Clay Nanocomposites (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2000).Google Scholar
9. Certain equipment and instruments or materials are identified in this paper in order to adequately specify the experimental details. Such identification does not imply recommendation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology nor does it imply the materials are the best available for the purpose. Google Scholar
10.According to ISO 31-8, the term “Molecular Mass” has been replaced by “Relative Molecular Mass”, symbol Mr. Thus, if this nomenclature and notation were to be followed, one would write, Mrw, instead of the historically conventional Mw for the mass average molecular weight and it would be called the “Mass Average Relative Molecular Mass”. The conventional notation rather than the ISO notation has been employed for this publication.Google Scholar
11. Ramsay, J. D. F., Swanton, S. W., J. Bunce, J. Chem.. Soc., Faraday Trans., 3919 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Pignon, F.et al., Phys. Rev. E 56, 3281 (1997).Google Scholar
13. Glinka, C. J.et al., J. Appl. Cryst., 430 (1998).Google Scholar
14. Straty, G. C., Hanley, H. J. M., Glinka, C. J., J. Statistical Physics 5/6, 1015 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Schmidt, G., Nakatani, A. I., Butler, P. D., Karim, A., Han, C. C., Macromolecules 33, 7219 (2000).Google Scholar
16. Roux, D. N., , F.; Diat, O., Europhys. Lett. 24, 53 (1993).Google Scholar
17. Kitade, S.et al., Macromolecules, 8083 (1998).Google Scholar
18. Wiesner, U., Macromol. Chem. Phys. 198, 3319 (1997).Google Scholar
19. Ferreiro, V., Schmidt, G., Han, C. C., Karim, A., ACS Nanocomposite Symp. Proceedings (2000).Google Scholar
20. Schmidt, G., Nakatani, A. I., Han, C. C., Rheol. Acta, submitted (2001).Google Scholar