Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:30:15.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polymer-Based Implantable Electrodes: State of the Art and Future Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Klaus Peter Koch ,
Anup Ramachandran ,
Wigand Poppendieck ,
Dara Feili  and
Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Klaus Peter Koch
Affiliation:
[email protected], Fraunhofer IBMT, Medical Technology and Neuroprosthetics, Ensheimer Strasse 48, St. Ingbert, Saarland, 66386, Germany, +49 (0)6894-980-404, +49 (0)6894-980-400
Anup Ramachandran
Affiliation:
[email protected], Fraunhofer-IBMT, Medical Technology and Neuroprosthetics, Ensheimer Strasse 48, St. Ingbert, Saarland, 66386, Germany
Wigand Poppendieck
Affiliation:
[email protected], Fraunhofer-IBMT, Medical Technology and Neuroprosthetics, Ensheimer Strasse 48, St. Ingbert, Saarland, 66386, Germany
Dara Feili
Affiliation:
[email protected], Fraunhofer-IBMT, Medical Technology and Neuroprosthetics, Ensheimer Strasse 48, St. Ingbert, Saarland, 66386, Germany
Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Affiliation:
[email protected], Fraunhofer-IBMT, Medical Technology and Neuroprosthetics, Ensheimer Strasse 48, St. Ingbert, Saarland, 66386, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Electrical interfaces between technical system and the biological system differs with respect to material and shape depending on their intended application. Although there are different approaches using silicon as basic material for sieve or needle like electrodes interfacing the nerve tissue. This abstract will focus on polymer-based flexible implantable electrodes.

Mechanical interaction between the electrode and tender nerve tissues can induce adverse body reaction such as fibrous tissue encapsulation. Using flexible materials to design the electro-biological interface might reduce this effect. Different designs of such flexible electrodes were proposed for contacting the nerve or as platform for sensors. For example, Cuff like electrodes can be elastically wrapped around the nerve for recording or stimulation of neural signals. Using microtechnology for the structuring of polymer substrates new fiber like electrodes with multiple electrode sites were developed that can be sewed into the nerve. Thereby the possibility of selective nerve recording and stimulation was improved. One major problem of these tiny and flexible electrodes is the connection to recording and stimulation system. Incorporating electronics such as multiplexer or amplifier directly on the flexible substrate could reduce the number of connection lines or improve the sensor capabilities. Further, the integration of flexible organic electronics on the implant allows the design of more flexible and intelligent electrodes. Additionally the electrodes and sensors can be designed using conductive polymers to create a new generation of “All Polymer” active implants. Not only the chemical and mechanical properties of the materials employed can influence the biocompatibility of an implant but also the surface topography in the nanometer range plays a key role such as the growth of cells on the implants. Selective adhesion of different type of cells to different parts of the implant is a challenge for the interdisciplinary research. Finally the combination of surface nanostructuring, for example the interference laser beam structuring, and organic electronics with microstructured polymer implants offers interesting potentials for new active implants of the next decades

Keywords

microstructurebiomedicallithography (deposition)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 926: Symposium CC – Electrobiological Interfaces on Soft Substrates , 2006 , 0926-CC06-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wallman, L, Zhang, Y, Laurell, T, Danielsen, N: The geometric design of micromachined silicon sieve electrodes influences functional nerve regeneration. Biomaterials, vol 22; 1187–1193 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Bengtsson, M, Wallman, L, Drott, J, Laurell, T: Porous silicon as an inherent surface enlarging layer for improved electrode performance in stimulation and recording applications. Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2229–2231 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Branner, A., Stein, R.B, Fernandez, E., Aoyagi, Y. and Normann, R.A.: Long-Term Stimulation and Recording With a Penetrating Microelectrode Array in Cat Sciatic Nerve, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, 146–157 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Bai, Q, Wise, KD, Anderson, DJ: A High-Yiel Microassembly Structure for Three-Dimensional Microelectrode Arrays. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 47; 281–289 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Wintermantel, E, Ha, S-W: Biokompatible Werkstoffe und Bauweisen. Springer, Heidelberg (1998).Google Scholar
6. Schmit, BD, Mortimer, JT: The tissue response to epimysial electrodes for diaphragm pacing in dogs. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol 44; 921–930 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Vuckovic, A, Struijk, JJ, Rijkhoff, NJ.: Influence of variable nerve fibre geometry on the excitation and blocking threshold. A simulation study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 43(3):365–74 (2005).Google Scholar
8. Mahadevappa, M., Weiland, J. D., Yanai, D., Fine, I., Grenberg, R. J. and Humayum, M.S.: Perceptual Thresholds and Electrode Impedance in Three Retinal Prosthesis Sujects. IEEE Trans. On Neural systems and rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 2 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Tyler, DJ, Durand, DM: Functional selective peripheral nerve stimulation with a flat interface nerve electrode. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol 10; 294–304 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Bullara, LA: Implantable Electrode Array. US Patent 623,981(4,573,481)Google Scholar
11. Grill, WM, Tarler, MD, Mortimer, JT: Implantable Helical Spiral Cuff Electrode. USPattent 230,342(5,505,201) (1994).Google Scholar
12. Baer, GA, Talonen, PP, Hakkinen, V, Exner, G, Yrjola, H.: Phrenic nerve stimulation in tetraplegia. A new regimen to condition the diaphragm for full-time respiration. Scand J Rehabil Med. 22(2):107–11 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Yoshida, K, Jovanovic, K, Stein, RB: Intrafascicular Electrodes for Stimulation and Recording from Mudpuppy Spinal Roots. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol 96; 47–55 (2000).Google Scholar
14. Lefurge, T, Goodall, E, Horch, K, Stensaas, L, Schoenberg, A: Chronically implanted intrafascicular recording electrodes. Annals of Biomedical Engineering; vol 19: 197–207 (1991)Google Scholar
15. Yoshida, K, Pellinen, D, Pivin, D, Rousche, P, Kipke, D: Development of the Thin-film Longitudinal Intra-fascicular Electrode. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society; 279–281 (2000).Google Scholar
16. Yoshida, K., Hennings, K., Kammer, S.: Acute performance of the Thin-Film Longitudinal Intra-Fascicular Electrode. IEEE BIOROB in Pisa (Italien) Februar (2006).Google Scholar
17. Ramachandran, A., Sacristan, J., Lago, N., Dörge, T., Navarro, X., Osés, M.T., Koch, K.P., Hoffmann, K.-P.: Multipolar Cuff Electrodes with Integrated Pre-amplifier & Filter to Interface Peripheral Nerves for FES. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society in Montreal (Kanada), 179–179, July (2005)Google Scholar
18. Meyer, J. U., Scholtz, O., Haberer, W., Beutel, H., and Stieglitz, T.: High density interconnects and flexible hybrid assemblies for active biomedical implants. IEEE Trans.on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology-Part B: Advanced Packaging 24, 366–374. (2001).Google Scholar
19. Feili, D., Schüttler, M., Koch, K.P., Stieglitz, T., Hoffmann, K.-P.: Organic Field Effect Transistors for Neural Stimulation – In Vivo Tests. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society in Montreal (Kanada), 397–399, (2005).Google Scholar
20. Feili, D., Schuettler, M., Koch, K.P., Stieglitz, T., Hoffmann, K.-P.: Organic Field Effect Transistors for Neural Stimulation – In Vitro Tests. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society in Montreal (Kanada), 394–396 (2005).Google Scholar
21. Koch, K. P., Kammer, S., Boehler, G., Hanauer, M., Hoffmann, K. P.: Hybrid Cuff Electrode for Recording Nerve Signals From Sacral Nerves. Biomedizinische Technik, 50 (1), 82–83 (2005).Google Scholar
22. Lago, N, Ceballos, D, FJ, Rodriguez, Stieglitz, T, Navarro, X.: Long term assessment of axonal regeneration through polyimide regenerative electrodes to interface the peripheral nerve. Biomaterials. 26(14):2021–31 (2005).Google Scholar
23. Dhillon, G. S., Lawrence, S. M., Hutchinson, D. T., and Horch, K. W.,: Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: implications for neural control of artificial limbs. J Hand Surg-AM, vol. 29, pp. 605–18 (2004).Google Scholar
24. DE, Weese-Mayer, JM, Silvestri, AS, Kenny, MN, Ilbawi, SA, Hauptman, JW, Lipton, PP, Talonen, Garcia, HG, Watt, JW, Exner, G, Baer, GA, Elefteriades, JA, Peruzzi, WT, Alex, CG, Harlid, R, Vincken, W, Davis, GM, Decramer, M, Kuenzle, C, Saeterhaug, A, and Schober, JG.: Diaphragm pacing with a quadripolar phrenic nerve electrode: an international study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Sep;19(9):1311–9.Google Scholar
25. Feili, D., Koch, K. P., Hoffmann, K.-P.: Development of Low Cost all Polymer Microelectrodes for Use in Neural Prosthetics Application. Biomedizinische Technik, Band 50, Ergänzungsband 1 Proceedings, 1531–1532 (2005).Google Scholar