Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:06:56.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plutonium and Neptunium Incorporation in Zirconolite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

B. D. Begg
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, PMB 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia, [email protected]
E. R. Vance
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, PMB 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia, [email protected]
R.A Day
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, PMB 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia, [email protected]
M. Hambley
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, PMB 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia, [email protected]
S. D. Conradson
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA
Get access

Abstract

The incorporation of Pu and Np in zirconolite (CaZrTi2O7) has been investigated over a range of redox conditions. Zirconolite formulations designed to favour either trivalent or tetravalent Pu and Np were prepared by limiting the amount of charge compensating additives available to maintain electroneutrality. From near-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy the Pu valence state was found to vary with the processing atmosphere, from completely tetravalent when fired in air, and located on either the Ca or Zr sites, to trivalent, when substituted on the Ca site after annealing in 3.5% H2/N2. Np was predominantly tetravalent over the range of redox conditions examined and was readily incorporated on either of zirconolite's Ca or Zr sites. The charge compensation mechanisms at work in different zirconolites are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lumpkin, G.R., Hart, K.P., McGlinn, P.J. and Payne, T.E., Radiochimica Acta, 66/67 469 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Lumpkin, G.R., Smith, K.L., Biackford, M.G., Hart, K.P., McGlinn, P., Gieré, R. and Williams, C.T., Proc. 9th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, (1994)Google Scholar
3. Bjorklund, C.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79 6347 (1958).10.1021/ja01581a001Google Scholar
4. Vance, E.R., Ball, C.J., Blackford, M.G., Cassidy, D.J. and Smith, K.L., J. Nucl. Mater., 175 55 (1990).10.1016/0022-3115(90)90270-WGoogle Scholar
5. Begg, B.D. et al. , to be publishedGoogle Scholar
6. Vance, E.R., Hart, K.P., Day, R.A., Begg, B.D., Angel, P.J., Loi, E., Weir, J. and Oversby, V.M., “Excess Pu Disposition in Zirconolite-Rich Synroc”, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, Ed. Murphy, W. and Knecht, D.A., Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, USA (1996).Google Scholar
7. Vance, E.R., Begg, B.D., Day, R.A. and Ball, C.J., “Zirconolite-Rich Ceramics for Actinide Wastes”, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, Ed. Murakami, T. and Ewing, R.C., Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, USA, 767 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Vance, E.R., Day, R.A., Zhang, Z., Begg, B.D., Ball, C.J. and Blackford, M.G., J. Solid State Chem., 124 77 (1996)Google Scholar
9. Begg, B.D. and Vance, E.R., “The Incorporation of Cerium in Zirconolite”, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX (this issue).Google Scholar
10. Vance, E.R., Ball, C.J., Smith, K.L., Blackford, M.G., Begg, B.D. and Angel, P.J., J. of Alloys and Compounds, 213/214 406 (1994).10.1016/0925-8388(94)90945-8Google Scholar
11. Coelho, A.A., Cheary, R.W. and Smith, K.L., (submitted to J. Solid. State Chem.)Google Scholar