Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:42:48.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plasma Spray of Nano Composite Ceramics Using Solution Precursors and Combustion Synthesized Nano Powders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Chigozie Kenechukwu Muoto
Affiliation:
[email protected]@uconn.edu, University of Connecticut, Chemical, Materials & Biomolecular Engineering, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
Eric H. Jordan
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Connecticut, Mechanical Engineering, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
Maurice Gell
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Connecticut, Chemical, Materials & Biomolecular Engineering, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
Mark Aindow
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Connecticut, Chemical, Materials & Biomolecular Engineering, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
Get access

Abstract

Plasma spraying is a well-established method for depositing nanostructured ceramic coatings on structural components. Two different plasma spraying techniques - solution precursor plasma spray (SPPS) and suspension plasma spray (SPS) - have been used to produce MgO-50vol% ZrO2 composite coatings. The microstructural features of the coatings were characterized using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) and X-Ray Diffractometry (XRD). The micro hardness of the coatings was measured on cross-sectional samples. The coatings produced using the SPS process with ethanol-based suspensions at a high plasma torch power (45.5 kW) exhibited the densest microstructures with hardnesses as high as ∼1350 HV. However, the backscattered electron (BSE) ESEM characterization of these coatings revealed that the coatings obtained using the SPPS technique had superior chemical homogeneity over those obtained using the SPS technique.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Furlong, L. R. and Domingues, L. P., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 12, 1051 (1966).Google Scholar
2. Sordelet, D. J. and Mufit, A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 12, 1148 (1988).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05807.xGoogle Scholar
3. Willingham, C., Wahl, J. M., Hogan, P. K., Kupferberg, L. C., and Wong, T. Y., Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 5078, 179 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Rice, R. W., J. Mater. Sci. 7, 1673 (1997).10.1023/A:1018511613779Google Scholar
5. Sadangi, R., Shukla, V., Al-Sharab, J., Kear, B., Stefanik, T. and Gentilman, R., Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 2912 (2007).Google Scholar
6. Lange, F. F., Balmer, M. L. and Levi, C. G., J. of Sol-Gel Sci. and Tech., 2, 317 (1994).10.1007/BF00486263Google Scholar
7. Cullity, B. D., “Elements of X-ray Diffraction”, Addison (Wesley Inc, 1967) pp 261263 Google Scholar
8. Lugscheider, E., Barimani, C., Eckert, P. and Eritt, U., Computational Matls. Sci., 7 109 (1996).10.1016/S0927-0256(96)00068-7Google Scholar
9. Fauchais, P.. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 9, R86 (2004).10.1088/0022-3727/37/9/R02Google Scholar