Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:37:57.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plasma Polymerization of Fluorocarbon Thin Films on Glass and Metal Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. J. O'Keefe
Affiliation:
Solid State Electronics Directorate, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433–6543
J. M. Rigsbee
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access

Abstract

Plasma polymerization of thin, fluorocarbon films onto glass, low carbon steel, and aluminium foil substrates using a hexafluoroethane (C2F6) glow discharge in a parallel plate, rf-sputter system was studied. Continuous, 100 nm thick fluoropolymer films were obtained when a graphite sputter target was used as the cathode material. Depositions conducted without the use of a consumable cathode produce continuous but thin (<10 nm) films of fluorocarbon material. Analysis of the plasma by optical emission spectroscopy determined that the dominant species in the discharge was CF2 for both target configurations. An increase in the intensity of specific CF2 transitions was observed when the graphite target was used. Characterization of the deposited films by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the C 1s and F 1s photoelectrons was used to determine the atomic F/C ratio and distribution of CF3, CF2, CF, C-CF, and C binding states. Films fabricated with the graphite target had a lower F/C ratio than depositions made without a consumable target. However, the distribution of binding states and the F/C ratio in the fluoropolymer was dependent on the substrate material. The results of the study indicate that the fluoropolymer film composition was significantly influenced by the underlying substrate material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Biederman, H., Vacuum 31, 285 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Bhasin, K., Jones, D.B., Sinharoy, S., and James, W.J., Thin Solid Films 45, 195 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Hollahan, J., Wydeven, T., and Johnson, C., Appl. Opt. 13, 1844 (1974).Google Scholar
4. Yasuda, H., Plasma Polymerization (Academic Press, Orlando, 1985).Google Scholar
5. d'Agostino, R. et al, in Plasma Deposition. Treatment and Etching of Polymers, edited by d'Agostino, R. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1990).Google Scholar
6. Dilks, A. and Kay, E., Macromolecules 14, 855 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Iriyama, Y. and Yasuda, H., J. Poly. Sci. A 30, 1731 (1992).Google Scholar
8. d'Agostino, R., Favia, P., and Fracassi, F., J. Poly. Sci. A 28, 3387 (1990).Google Scholar
9. d'Agostino, R., Cramarossa, F., and Illuzzi, F., J. App. Phy. 61, 2754 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Takada, T., Akahoshi, H., and Takahashi, A., Kobunshi Ronbunshu 47, 549 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. d'Agostino, R., Crarnarossa, F., and DeBenedictis, S., Plasma Chem. and Plasma Process. 3, 213 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Astell-Burt, P.J., Cairns, J.A., Cheetam, A.K., and Hazel, R.M., Plasma Chem. And Plasma Process. 4, 417 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Fracassi, F., Occhiello, E., and Coburn, J.W., J. App. Phy. 62, 3980 (1987).Google Scholar
14. King, D.S., Schenck, P.K., and Stephenson, J.C., J. of Mol Spec. 78, 1 (1979).Google Scholar
15. Millard, M.M. and Kay, E., J. Elec. Soc. 129, 160 (1982).Google Scholar
16. Flamm, D. L., J. App. Phy. 51, 5688 (1981).Google Scholar