Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:56:18.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plasma Gas Composition and Pressure Effects on the Sintering of Stabilized Zirconia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

P. Kong
Affiliation:
Center for Plasma-Aided Manufacturing, Dept. Of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
E. Pfender
Affiliation:
Center for Plasma-Aided Manufacturing, Dept. Of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Yttria stabilized zirconia powder compacts were rapidly sintered in rf plasmas. Final sintered densities varied with plasma gas composition and plasma pressure. The final densities obtained at low pressures were comparable to those obtained at high pressures. This fact can be explained by plasma chemical effects which enhanced sintering at low pressures. Specimen exposure time in the plasma has a minor effect on the final sintered density. The experimental results demonstrates that the powder processing history has a strong influence on the sintering process. Sintered densities exceeding 97% of the theoretical value were obtained in less than 5 minutes in mixed plasmas. X-ray analysis of the sintered specimens shows the formation of single phased cubic solid solutions. SEM analysis of the high density samples shows uniformly fine-grained microstructures with some isolated intragranular micropores. Low density specimens show large open pores along the grain boundaries and at the triple points indicating sintering stops at an early stage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bennett, C.E.G., Mckinnon, N.A. and Williams, L.S., Nature, 217, p1287(1968).Google Scholar
2. Cordone, L.G. and Martinsen, W.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 55[7], p380(1975).Google Scholar
3. Thomas, G. and Freim, J., Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 21, p182(1975).Google Scholar
4. Johnson, D.L. and Rizzo, R.A., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull.,59[4], p 467(1980).Google Scholar
5. Johnson, D.L., Kramb, V.A., Lynch, D.C., Proc. MRS Fall Meeting, 17, p207(1982).Google Scholar
6. Kim, J.S. and Johnson, D.L., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 62 p620(1983).Google Scholar
7. Pan, W.X., Hata, H., Yoshida, T. and Akashi, K., Proc. ISPC-8, p1638(1987).Google Scholar
8. Kijima, K., Proc. ISPC-8, p1632(1987).Google Scholar
9. Kong, P., Lau, Y.C. and Pfender, E., Proc. Adv. Ceramics'87, SME, EM87–108(1987).Google Scholar
10. Kong, P., Lau, Y.C. and Pfender, E., Proc. MRS 1987 Spring Meeting, 98, p371(1988).Google Scholar
11. Kong, P., Lau, Y.C. and Pfender, E., Ceramic Transactions, 1[B], Ceramic Powder Science, p939(1988).Google Scholar
12. Kong, P., Wallenhorst, W., McHenry, K. and Koepke, B., Ceramic Transactions, 1[A], Ceramic Powder Science, p196(1988).Google Scholar