Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T02:27:24.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pixe Spectrometry as an Aid to Reconstruction of Ancient Processes of Bronze Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

C.P. Swann  and
S.J. Fleming
C.P. Swann
Affiliation:
Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
S.J. Fleming
Affiliation:
MASCA, The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104
Get access

Extract

The process of translating copper ore into a finished bronze involved a series of discrete steps (Fig. 1), the products and by-products of which comprise a diversity of materials. The full characterization of these materials, and thereby the reconstruction of how the metalworking artisans of a particular culture went about their craft, requires a variety of analytical tools, each applied with specific interpretive goals in mind. For example, the use of high power optical microscopy (with magnifications ranging 10x to 400x) allows a qualitative description of ore and slag petrography [1], and the definition of individual phases in metal microstructure (see, for example, refs. [2,3]); the use of high temperature cell (HTC) microscopy, offers a novel means of studying a slag's thermodynamic properties [4]; and so on.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 123: Symposium L – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology I , 1988 , 77
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bachmann, H-G., The Identification of Slags from Archaeological Sites (Institute of Archaeology Occasional Publication 6, London 1982).Google Scholar
2. Vernon, W.W., MASCA Journ. 3 (5), 154 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Balthazar, J.W., MASCA Journ. A (20, 626 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Kim, C.K., Sommerville, I.D. and McLean, A., ISS Trans. 1 (2), 15 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Fleming, S.J. and Swann, C.P., Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A242, 626 (1986).Google Scholar
6.. Swann, C.P. and Fleming, S.J., SEM 1988 (part I), in press (1988).Google Scholar
7. Shimada, I., Epstein, S. and Craig, A.K., Archaeology 36 (5), 38 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Moorey, P.R.S., Ur “of the Chaldees” (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 1982)Google Scholar
9. Schmidt, E.F., Excavations at Tepe Hissar Damghan (University Museum, Philadelphia, 1931).Google Scholar
10. Dyson, R.H. Jr., Journ. Near Eastern Stud. XXIV, 193 (1965).Google Scholar
11. Fleming, S.J. and Swann, C.P., Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res., in pressGoogle Scholar
12. Folkmann, F., Journ. Phys. E: Sci. Instr. 8, 429 (1975).Google Scholar
13. Hall, E.T., Schweizer, F. and Toller, P.A., Archaeometry J 15, 53 (1973).Google Scholar
14. Florkowski, T. and Stos, Z., Archaeometry 11, 165 (1975).Google Scholar
15. Woldseth, R., X-ray Energy Spectrometry (Kevex Corp., Burlingame, CA 1973).Google Scholar
16. Watt, F., Grime, G.W., Takacs, J. and Vaux, D.J.T., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Res., B3 599 (1984).Google Scholar
17. Malmquist, K.G., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Res., B14 86 (1986).Google Scholar
18. Merkel, J., MASCA Journ. 3 (5), 164 (1985).Google Scholar
19. Merkel, J., MASCA Journ. 2 (6), 173 (1983).Google Scholar