Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:34:59.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photothermal Deflection Spectroscopy Investigations of Uranium Electrochemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

James D. Rudnicki
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA
Richard E. Russo
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA
Get access

Abstract

Photothermal Deflection Spectroscopy (PDS) has been successfully applied to the study of uranium oxide electrochemistry. A brief description of PDS and preliminary results that demonstrate the technique are presented. Concentration gradients formed at the electrode surface are measured by this technique. The gradients give insight into the reaction mechanisms. There is some evidence of the initiation of non-electrochemical dissolution of the uranium oxide. Optical absorption by the uranium oxide is measured by PDS and the first results indicate that the absorption of the surface does not change during electrochemical experiments. This result is contrary to literature measurements of bulk samples that indicate that the optical absorption should be strongly changing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Russo, R.E., McLarnon, F.R., Spear, J.D., and Cairns, E.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 134(11), 2783 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Haas, O., Rudnicki, J., McLarnon, F.R., and Cairns, E.J., Faraday Transactions, 87(7), 939 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Rudnicki, J.D., McLarnon, F.R., and Cairns, E.J., Techniques for Characterization of Electrodes and Electrochemical Processes, Varma, R. and Selman, J.R., (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
4. Rudnicki, J.D., Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 1992. (also published as Report LBL-32127, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, March 1992.)Google Scholar
5. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Bailey, M.G., Stanchell, F.W., and McIntyre, N.S., J. Electroanal. Chem, 130, 163 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Bailey, M.G., and Wallace, G.J., J. Electroanal. Chem., 150, 217 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Bailey, M.G., and Owen, D.G., in Passivity of Metals and Semiconductors, Proc. 5th Intern. Symp. on Passivity, Bombannes, France, Froment, M. (ed.), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 125 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Bailey, M.G., Wallace, G.J., and Stanchell, F.W., in Applications of Surface Science, 20, 39 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Nicol, M.J, and Needes, C.R.S., Electrochem. Acta., 20, 585 (1975).Google Scholar
10. Nicol, M.J., and Needes, C.R.S., Electrochem. Acta., 22, 1381 (1977).Google Scholar
11. Naegele, J., Manes, L., and Birkholtz, U., in Plutonium and Other Actinides, Blank, H., and Linder, R. (eds.), North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1976.Google Scholar
12. Griffiths, T.R., and Hubbard, H.V., J. Nuclear Materials, 185, 243 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Griffiths, T.R., Hubbard, H.V., Allen, G.C., and Tempest, P.A., J. Nuclear Materials, 151, 307 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Hubbard, H.V., and Griffiths, T.R., J. Chem Soc., Faraday Trans., 2, 1215 (1987).Google Scholar
15. Ackermann, R.J., Thorn, R.J., and Winslow, G.H., J. Optical Soc. Amer., 49(11), 1107 (1959).Google Scholar