Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:30:54.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photoreflectance and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy in Lt MBE GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D. C. Look
Affiliation:
University Research Center, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435
J. E. Hoelscher
Affiliation:
University Research Center, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435
J. T. Grant
Affiliation:
Research Institute, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469
C. E. Stutz
Affiliation:
Wright Laboratory (WL/ELRA), Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
K. R. Evans
Affiliation:
Wright Laboratory (WL/ELRA), Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
M. Numan
Affiliation:
Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Dept. of Physics, Indiana, PA 15705
Get access

Abstract

It has recently been shown that a 1000Å cap layer of molecular beam epitaxial (MBE) GaAs grown at 200°C passivates the surface of a GaAs active layer (n≃2×1017cm−3) in the sense of reducing the free–carrier depletion which arises from surface acceptor states. The same phenomenon holds for active-layer concentrations up to 7×1018cm−3, for caps as thin as 14Å, and for either As2 or As4 anion species. In an attempt to understand these effects, we have applied photoreflectance (PR) and x–ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In general, the PR shows contributions from the surface, cap/active–layer interface, and active–layer/buffer–layer interface, because each of these regions can have a different electric field. In fact the various field strengths can be determined from Franz–Keldysh oscillations (FKO), and good agreement with Hall–effect measurements is usually found. However, for 200°C material, no PR is seen, suggesting that there is no surface charge (no surface acceptor states below the Fermi level) or at least no surface–charge modulation by the light. The XPS data, which arise only from the near–surface (∼30Å) region, show that the binding energies in the capped samples are increased (i.e., surface Fermi pinning energy decreased) by 0.2 eV with respect to those in the uncapped samples. These data are discussed in relation to a passivation model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Calawa, A.R., this volume.Google Scholar
2.Smith, F.W., this volume.Google Scholar
3.Look, D.C., Stutz, C.E., and Evans, K.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2570 (1990).Google Scholar
4.Kaminska, M., Liliental-Weber, Z., Weber, E.R., George, T., Kortright, J.B., Smith, F.W., Tsaur, B-Y., and Calawa, A.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 1881 (1989).10.1063/1.101229Google Scholar
5.Look, D.C., Walters, D.C., Manasreh, M.O., Sizelove, J.R., Stutz, C.E., and Evans, K.R., Phys. Rev. B 42, 3578 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.42.3578Google Scholar