Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:01:27.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photoconductivity Transient Response from the Steady State in Amorphous Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C. Main
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DD1 1HG, Scotland, UK, [email protected]
S. Reynolds
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DD1 1HG, Scotland, UK, [email protected]
J.- H. Zollondz
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DD1 1HG, Scotland, UK, [email protected]
R. Bruggemann
Affiliation:
F.B. Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, D-261 11 Oldenburg, Germany
Get access

Abstract

We present analysis, computer modelling and experimental measurements of the photoconductive decay which occurs on cessation of illumination, in amorphous semiconductors. We explore the processes of relaxation of the excess carrier distributions, and examine the relative rôles of re-trapping and recombination in a model case of an exponential trapping state profile, with monomolecular recombination. A variety of possible decay behaviour is revealed. We examine several plausible intuitive explanations of the decay process, including (a) the assumption that the rate limiting step in the decay process is the thermal release of trapped carriers from the vicinity of the quasi - Fermi level, and (b) multiple re-trapping at the quasi -Fermi level prior to recombination. Actual decay rates, however are often much faster than that predicted by these assumptions, and the generation rate dependencies do not follow the relation expected. These explanations are shown in detail to be largely erroneous. Results of experimental measurements of the decay from steady state and TPC in films of a-Si1-xCx:H are presented. While these appear initially to be at variance with the predictions of the present work, we demonstrate that the observations can be reconciled fully with theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Adriaenssens, G.J., Baranovskii, S.D., Fuhs, W., Jansen, J. and Öktti, Ö., Phys. Rev B111, 9661, 1995.Google Scholar
[2] Brtiggemann, R., Solid State Comms. L10, 199, 1997.Google Scholar
[3] Cordes, H., Bauer, G.H. and Brtiggemann, R., Phys. Rev. B58, 16160, 1998.Google Scholar
[4] Popovic, P., Bassanese, E., Smole, F., Furlan, J., Grebner, S. and Schwarz, R., J.Appl. Phys. 82, 4504, 1997.Google Scholar
[5] Ryvkin, S.M., Photoelectric Effects in Semiconductors (Consultants Bureau New York 1964), ch6.Google Scholar
[6] Rose, A., RCA Rev. 12, 362, 1951.Google Scholar
[7] Main, C., Berkin, J. and Merazga, A., in New Physical Problems in Electronic Materials, ed Borissov, M., Kirov, N., Marshall, J.M., and Vavrek, A., (World Scientific Press, Singapore, 1991) pp 5586.Google Scholar
[8] Main, C., in Amorphous and Microcrystalline Silicon Technology-1997, ed. Hack, M., Schiff, E.A., Wagner, S., Matsuda, A. and Schropp, R., MRS Symp. Proc., Vol 467, (MRS, Pittsburgh 1997) Ch.143, pp.167178.Google Scholar