Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:17:50.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photochemical Reactivity of Sr2Nb2O7 and Sr2Ta2O7 as a Function of Surface Orientation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Jennifer L. Giocondi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213–3890, U.S.A.
Ariana M. Zimbouski
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213–3890, U.S.A.
Gregory S. Rohrer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213–3890, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Sr2Nb2O7 and Sr2Ta2O7 have a (110) layered perovskite structure and are efficient photolysis catalysts. Aqueous silver and lead cations were photochemically reduced and oxidized, respectively, on the surfaces of Sr2Nb2O7 and Sr2Ta2O7 crystals with a wide range of orientations. Atomic force microscopy has been used to observe the distribution of photochemically reduced and oxidized products and determine the orientation dependence of the reactivity. On surfaces with the same orientation, reaction products frequently had a non-uniform distribution. The reactivity of both compounds proved to be only weakly anisotropic, with the highest relative reactivity for both oxidation and reduction occurring for surfaces oriented between (010), (110), and (011). These low index orientations have structures similar to the ideal {110} and {100} planes in the perovskite structure, respectively. The relationship of the perovskite structure to the reactivity is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Domen, K., in Surface Photochemistry, edited by Anpo, M. (J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, 1996) p. 1.Google Scholar
[2] Hwang, D.W., Kim, H.G., Kim, J., Cha, K.Y., Kim, Y.G., and Lee, J.S., J. Catalysis 193, 40 (2000).Google Scholar
[3] Takata, T., Furumi, Y., Shinohara, K., Tanaka, A., Hara, M., Kondo, J.N., and Domen, K., Chem. Mat. 9, 1063 (1997).Google Scholar
[4] Kohno, M., Ogura, S., Sato, K., and Inoue, Y., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 94 (1), 89 (1998).Google Scholar
[5] Inoue, Y., Kubokawa, T., and Sato, K., J. Phys. Chem. 95, 4059 (1991).Google Scholar
[6] Ishizawa, N., Murumo, F., Kawamura, T., and Kimura, M., Acta Crystallogr. B32, 2464 (1976).Google Scholar
[7] Ishizawa, N., Murumo, F., Kawamura, T., and Kimura, M., Acta Crystallogr. B31, 1912 (1975).Google Scholar
[8] Kudo, A., Kato, H., and Nakagawa, S., J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 571 (2000).Google Scholar
[9] Herrmann, J.-M., Disdier, J., and Pichat, P., J. Catalysis 113 (1), 72 (1988).Google Scholar
[10] Clark, W.C. and Vondjidis, A.G., J. Catalysis 4 (6), 691 (1965).Google Scholar
[11] Tanaka, K., Harada, K., and Murata, S., Solar Energy 36, 159 (1986).Google Scholar
[12] Torres, J. and Cervera-March, S., Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, 3857 (1992).Google Scholar
[13] Lowekamp, J.B., Rohrer, G.S., Morris Hotsenpiller, P.A., Bolt, J.D., and Farneth, W.D., J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (38), 7323 (1998).Google Scholar
[14] Giocondi, J.L. and Rohrer, G.S., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., submitted.Google Scholar
[15] Giocondi, J.L. and Rohrer, G.S., Chem. Mater. 13 (2), 241 (2001).Google Scholar