Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:19:06.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanostructured film grown by activated reactive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yuvaraj Dhayalan
Affiliation:
[email protected], Indian Institute of Science, Department of Instrumentation, Bangalore, India
narasimha rao k
Affiliation:
[email protected], Indian Institute of Science, Department of Instrumentation, Bangalore, India
Get access

Abstract

ZnO nanostructured films were deposited at room temperature on glass substrates and cotton fabrics by activated reactive evaporation in a single step without using metal catalyst or templates. Morphological observation has shown that the nanostructured film contains seaurchin-like structures, and this seaurchin containing large number of randomly grown ZnO nanoneedles. Microstructural analysis revealed the single crystalline nature of the grown nanoneedles and their growth direction was indentified to be along [0002]. PL spectrum of nanostructured films has shown a relatively weak near-band-edge emission peak at 380 nm, and a significant broad peak at 557 nm due to the oxygen vacancy-related emission. ZnO nanostructured films grown on glass substrates and cotton fabrics have shown good photocatalytic activity against rhodamine B.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Edelstein, A. S. and Cammarata, R. C., “Nanomaterials: synthesis, properties and applications”, Institute of Physics Philadelphia PA, (1996).Google Scholar
2 Wang, Z. L., J. Phys. Condens. Mater. 16 R829 (2004).Google Scholar
3 Schmidt-Mende, L. L and MacManus-Driscoll, J. L., Mater. Today 10 40 (2007).Google Scholar
4 Yuvaraj, D., Rao, K. N. and Nanda, K. K., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys 42 035403 (2009).Google Scholar
5 Durán, N., Marcato, P. D., Souza, G. I. H. De, Alves, O. L. and Esposito, E., J. Biomedical Nanotechnology 3, 203 (2007).Google Scholar
6 Vigneshwaran, N., Kumar, S., Kathe, A. A., Varadarajan, P. V. and Prasad, V., Nanotechnology 17, 5087 (2006).Google Scholar
7 Perelshtein, I., Applerot, G., Perkas, N., Wehrschetz-Sig, E., Hasmann, A., Guebitz, G. M. and Gedanken, A., Appl. Mater. Interface 1, 361 (2009).Google Scholar
8 El-Naggar, A. M., Zohdy, M. H., Hassan, M. S. and Khalil, E. M., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 88, 1129 (2003).Google Scholar
9 Djurisic, A. B. and Leung, Y. H.; Small 2, 944 (2006).Google Scholar
10 Jing, L., Qu, Y., Wang, B., Li, S., Jiang, B., Yang, L., Fu, W., Fu, H. and Sun, J., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90, 1773 (2006).Google Scholar