Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:19:07.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase Separation Studies of Confined Thin Film Polymer Blends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Q. Pan  and
R. J. Composto
Q. Pan
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Philadelphia, PA 19104
R. J. Composto
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

Using video-optical microscopy and image analysis software, the morphological development of phase separation of polystyrene (PS) and poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) blends is monitored for film thickness ranging from 200 to 700nm's. In the current studies, films are confined between glass slides. For blends having a PS volume fraction of 0.30 (the critical composition), the area fraction of the PS-rich minority phase, A, decreases more rapidly as film thickness decreases. At long times, the final A achieves a constant value which is less than the bulk value. The correlation length of concentration fluctuations increases more rapidly than the bulk scaling prediction, which suggests that wetting plays a significant role in the phase separation kinetics of thin films. Because of confinement, the shape of the PS-rich phase is anisotropic, flattened along the film direction. The confinement restricts the phase growth perpendicular to the film plane, and thus hinders the development of phase separation at very late stages.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 366: Symposium N – Dynamics in Small Confining Systems , 1994 , 27
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Swalen, J. D. et al., Langmuir, 3, 932 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Gunton, J. D., Miguel, M. San, and Sahni, P., in Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena, vol.8, edited by Domb, C. and Lebowitz, J. H. (Academic, London, 1983).Google Scholar
3. Mader, S. and Herd, S., Thin Solid Films, 10, 377 (1972).Google Scholar
4. Desideri, J. P. and Scornette, D., J. Phys. France, 49, 1411 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Reich, S. and Cohen, Y., J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 19, 1255 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Tang, H., Szleifer, I., and Kumar, S., J. Chem. Phys., 100, 5367 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Kumar, S., Tang, H., and Szleifer, I., Molecular Physics, 81, 867 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Katzen, D. and Reich, S., Europhys. Lett., 21, 55 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Tanaka, H., Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 2770 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Tanaka, H., Europhys. Lett., 24, 665 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Tanaka, H., Phys. Rev. Lett., 72, 1702 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Jones, R. A. L., Norton, L. J., Kramer, E. J., Bates, F. S., and Wiltzius, P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 1326 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Krausch, G., Dai, C., Kramer, E. J., Marko, J. F., and Bates, F. S., Macromolecules, 26, 5566 (1993).Google Scholar
14. Bruder, F. and Brenn, R., Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 624 (1992).Google Scholar
15. Seferis, J. C., in Polymer Handbook, 3rd ed., edited by Brandrup, J. and Immergut, E. H. (Jonh Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1989).Google Scholar
16. Bhatia, Q. S., Pan, D. H., and , J. K., Macromolecules, 21, 2166 (1988).Google Scholar