Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:22:21.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase Separation in Alumina-Chromia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

M. S. McIntosh ,
T. H. Sanders Jr  and
J. M. Hampikian
M. S. McIntosh
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0245
T. H. Sanders Jr
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0245
J. M. Hampikian
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0245
Get access

Abstract

The alumina-chromia system shows complete mutual solubility and is represented by an isomorphous phase diagram. However, the alumina-chromia system exhibits an asymmetric miscibility gap under 1300°C. Using existing data from the literature, the alumina-chromia system was assessed using thermodynamic modeling by Kim and Sanders [1]. Regular and subregular solution models for the liquid and solid phases were used to define the phase boundaries for the miscibility gap in this system. Using this thermodynamic representation of the miscibility gap to select temperatures of interest, 75 mole percent Al2O3samples were synthesized via combustion of powders, followed by pressing into pellets and heat-treated for various times and temperatures. Both X-ray and TEM analysis showed evidence of spinodal decomposition after heat-treatment. X-ray analysis showed that decreasing the heat-treatment temperature increases the compositional difference between the phases present. The experimentally observed microstructures exhibit lamella-like structures that vary in spacing from 8nm to 3nm as the heat-treatment temperature varies from 400°C to 800°C.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 731: Symposium W – Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Materials Behavior and Evolution , 2002 , W8.7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kim, S. S. and Sanders, T. H. Jr, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 84 (8), 1881–1884 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Bloss, F. D., Crystallography and Crystal Chemistry, Holt, Rinehart, and Winton, Inc., New York, (1971).Google Scholar
3. Bunting, E. N., J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., 6 (6), 947–949 (1931).Google Scholar
4. Neuhaus, A., The Physics and Chemistry of High Pressures, Society of Chemical Industry, London, 237–239 (1963).Google Scholar
5. Neuhaus, A., Jumpertz, E. and Brenner, P., Fortschr. Mineral., 40, 60 (1963).Google Scholar
6. Schultz, A. H. and Stubican, V. S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 53 (11), 613–616 (1970).Google Scholar
7. Roy, D. M., Barks, R. E., Nature. Phys. Sci., 235, 118–119 (1972).Google Scholar
8. Sitte, W., Mater. Sci. Monogr., 28A, 451–456 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Kaufman, L. and Nesor, H., CALPHAD: Comput. Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem., 2 (1), 35–53 (1978).Google Scholar
10. Degterov, S. and Pelton, A. D., J. Phase Equilib., 17 (6), 476–487 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Roth, R. S. (Ed.) Fig 9285 in Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, Vol. 11, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, (1995).Google Scholar
12. Jain, S. R., Adiga, K. C. and Verneker, V. R. Pai, Combust. Flame 40, 71–79 (1981).Google Scholar
13. Kingsley, J. J., Suresh, K. and Patil, K. C., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 1305–1312 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Bhaduri, S., Zhou, E. and Bhaduri, S. B., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 18 (4), 645–652 (1997).Google Scholar
15. McIntosh, M. S., Hampikian, J. M. and Sanders, T. H., (2002). (unpublished).Google Scholar