Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:47:13.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phase Decomposition in Cu-Ti Metallic Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R. D. Shull
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC 20234;
S. P. Singhal
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC 20234;
B. Mozer
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC 20234;
A. Maeland
Affiliation:
Allied Corporation, Morristown, NJ
Get access

Abstract

A metallic glass ribbon of Cu55Ti45 prepared by melt spinning was examined by x-ray, neutron, and electron diffraction, by small angle neutron diffraction (SANS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and by differential thermal analysis (DTA). In the liquid quenched condition large angle diffraction data (both x-ray and neutron) show the broad banded structure typical of the amorphous state. The SANS data, however, exhibit highly anisotropic patterns arising from the phase decomposition during solidification. Ribbons annealed below the glass transition temperature (Tg ) produced neutron diffraction patterns of materials with the same amorphous structure combined with a new short range order; and the SANS patterns retained the asymmetry of the as-quenched material. Ribbons annealed above the crystallization temperature (Tc) show both isotropic and anisotropic contributions to the SANS patterns. Formation of the equilibrium TiCu phase occurs directly from the metallic glass at Tc. The equilibrium Ti3Cu4 phase, however, forms from the TiCu phase at slightly higher temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Walter, J. L., Rapid Solification Processing II, (Edited by Mehrabian, R., Kear, B., and Cohen, M.) Claitor Publishing Co., Baton Rouge, LA (1980) p. 79.Google Scholar
2. Walter, John L., Bartram, Stanley F., and Mella, Ignacio, Materials Science and Engineering 36 (1978) 193.10.1016/0025-5416(78)90072-1Google Scholar
3. MacDowell, J. F. and Beall, G. H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52 (1) (1969) 17.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb12653.xGoogle Scholar
4. Glinka, C. J., “Neutron Scattering - 1981”, AIP Conf. Proc. 89 (Edited by Faber, J. Jr.) AIP, New York (1982) p. 395.Google Scholar
5. Sakata, Makoto, Cowlams, Neil, and Davies, Hywel A., Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Rapidly Quenched Metals Sendai, Japan (1981) p. 327.Google Scholar
6. Buschow, K. H. J., Acta Metall., Vol. 00 (1982) 1.Google Scholar
7. Marshall, A. F., Lee, Y. S., Stevenson, D. A., Acta Metall. 31, No. 8 (1983) 1225.10.1016/0001-6160(83)90184-0Google Scholar
8. Murray, J., Bull. of Alloy Phase Diagrams 4(1), (1983), 88.10.1007/BF02884856Google Scholar
9. Sakata, M., Cowlams, N., and Davies, H. A., J.-Phys. F: Metal Phys. 9, No. 12 (1979) L235;10.1088/0305-4608/9/12/001Google Scholar
and vol. 11 (1981) L157.10.1088/0305-4608/11/7/005Google Scholar
10. Sakata, M., Cowlams, N., and Davies, H. A., J. Physique 41, C8, (1980) 190.Google Scholar