Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:40:13.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistence of Granular Structure during Die Compaction of Ceramic Powders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

William J. Walker Jr
William J. Walker Jr*
Affiliation:
New York State Center for Advanced Ceramic Technology at Alfred University, Alfred, NY 14802, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Glass spheres were used as a model system to investigate granule failure during die compaction. Stresses within an assembly of spheres follow a network of pathways. When the spheres are of uniform composition, the magnitude of the stresses within a pair of contacting granules is a function of the locally transmitted stress and the diameter of the two spheres. Results obtained using glass spheres demonstrated the statistical nature of granule failure during compaction, with some granules failing at very low applied pressures while others (∼40% by volume) persist at even the highest applied loads. Within a distribution of granule sizes, those granules with smaller diameter were seen to have a higher probability of failure at low pressure than were larger granules. These results are consistent with those observed during die compaction of granulated alumina powder.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 627: Symposium BB – The Granular State , 2000 , BB6.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Reed, J.S., Principles of Ceramic Processing, 2nd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1995), pp. 425–33.Google Scholar
2. Cundall, P.A., Drescher, A. and Strack, O.D.L., in IUTAM Symposium on Deformation and Failure of Granular Materials, edited by Vermeer, P.A. and Luger, H.J. (A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1982), pp. 355–70.Google Scholar
3. Drescher, A. and de Josselin de Jong, G., J. Mech. Phys. Sol., 20, 337–51 (1972).Google Scholar
4. Roark, R.J. and Young, W.C., Formulas for Stress and Strain, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1975), pp. 513–29.Google Scholar
5. Walker, W.J. Jr, and Reed, J.S., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 78 (6), 53–57, (1999).Google Scholar