Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:46:05.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Passive Dissolution and Localized Corrosion of Alloy 22 High-Level Waste Container Weldments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

D. S. Dunn ,
G. A. Cragnolino  and
N. Sridhar
D. S. Dunn
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166, [email protected]
G. A. Cragnolino
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166
N. Sridhar
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166
Get access

Abstract

Localized corrosion of high level nuclear waste containers is considered an important factor that will have a strong influence on the overall performance of the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, NV. The present candidate container material, Alloy 22 [UNS N06022 (57Ni-22Cr-13.5Mo-3W-3Fe)], is highly resistant to localized corrosion. Assessing the performance of the HLW containers also requires an evaluation of localized corrosion resistance and determination of the passive corrosion rate of Alloy 22 weldments. The localized corrosion resistance of welded Alloy 22 specimens was evaluated by measuring the repassivation potential in chloride containing solutions whereas potentiostatic tests were used to determine the passive corrosion rate of the welded material. The results for the welded material are compared to those for the base metal.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 608: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIII , 1999 , 89
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 U.S. Department of Energy, Repository Safety Strategy: U.S. Department of Energy's Strategy to Protect Public Health and Safety After Closure of a Yucca Mountain Repository, YMP/96-01 Rev. 1, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, 1988.Google Scholar
2 Harrington, P. License application design selection (LADS) overview and process. 111th Meeting Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste, Washington, DC, July 20, 1999. Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1999.Google Scholar
3 Dunn, D. S., Cragnolino, G. A., and Sridhar, N. Methodologies for Predicting the Performance of Ni-Cr-Mo Alloys Proposed for High Level Nuclear Waste Containers. Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management. MRS Symposium Proceedings. 1999.Google Scholar
4 Dunn, D. S., Pan, Y-M., and Cragnolino, G.A. Effects of Environmental Factors on the Aqueous Corrosion of High-Level Radioactive Waste Containers-Experimental Results and Models. CNWRA 99-004. San Antonio, TX: Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses. 1999.Google Scholar
5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Issue Resolution Status Report, Key Technical Issue: Container Life and Source Term, Revision 2, Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1999.Google Scholar
6 Cragnolino, G.A., Dunn, D.S., Brossia, C.S., Jain, V., and Chan, K.S.. Assessment of Performance Issues Related to Alternate Engineered Barrier System Materials and Design Options. CNWRA 99-003. San Antonio, TX: Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses. 1999.Google Scholar
7 American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for conducting cyclic potentiodynamic polarization measurements for localized corrosion susceptibility of iron-, nickel- or cobalt-based alloys: G61-86. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Volume 03.02: Wear and Erosion-Metal Corrosion. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials: 237-241. 1999b.Google Scholar
8 Heubner, U.L., Altpeter, E., Rockel, M.B., and Wallis, E.. Electrochemical behavior and its relation to composition and sensitization ofNi-Cr-Mo alloys in ASTM G-28 solution. Corrosion 45(3): 249–259. 1989.Google Scholar
9 Kasparova, O.V. The break-down of the passive state of grain boundaries and intergranular corrosion of stainless steels. Protection of Metals 34(6): 520–526. 1998.Google Scholar
10 Raghavan, M., Mueller, R.R., Vaughn, G. A., and Floreen, S.. Determination of isothermal sections of nickel rich portion of Ni-Cr-Mo system by analytical electron microscopy. Metallurgical Transactions 15A: 783–792. 1984.Google Scholar
11 Cieslak, M.J., Headley, T.J., and Romig, A.D. Jr, The welding metallurgy of Hastelloy alloys C-4, C-22, and C-276. Metallurgical Transactions 17A: 2,035–2,047. 1986a.Google Scholar
12 American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard tests methods of detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack in wrought, nickel-rich, chromium-bearing alloys: G28. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Volume 03.02: Wear and Erosion-Metal Corrosion. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials: 84-88. 1999d.Google Scholar
13 Cieslak, M.J., Knorovsky, G.A., Headley, T.J., and Romig, A.D. Jr, The use of PHACOMP in understanding the solidification microstructure of nickel base alloy weld metal. Metallurgical Transactions 17A: 2,107–2,116. 1986b.Google Scholar