Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:45:52.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particle Size Measurement in Optical Waveguide Manufacturing Torches Using Dynamic Light Scattering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. R. Bautista ,
Eugene Potkay  and
Daria L. Scatton
J. R. Bautista
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Eugene Potkay
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Daria L. Scatton
Affiliation:
Univ. of Illinois, Dept. of Ceramic Engineering, Champaign, IL.
Get access

Abstract

The characterization of silica “sooting” torches used in optical waveguide manufacture by external flame-hydrolysis deposition processes such as Outside Vapor Deposition (OVD) and Vapor-phase Axial Deposition (VAD) prflents a formid.ble high temperature environment at > 2000°C in the presence of > 1012 particles/cm3 of silica. This paper describes the first application of Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) to probe particle sizes in an actual lightguide burner following the “triple-flame” VAD design. DLS, also termed Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (PCS) or Diffusion Broadening Spectroscopy (DBS), was previously identified as a viable diagnostic tool for in-situ particle measurements in silica-sooting flames by W. L. Flower [1] and through an earlier collaboration between AT&T and the Sandia Combustion Research Facility. In applying DLS, however, our experience with the VAD torch reveals that a specialized experimental method will undoubtedly be required to deal with the inevitable presence of low frequency system instabilities in industrial systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 117: Symposium C – Process Diagnostics: Materials, Combustion, Fusion , 1988 , 151
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Flower, W.L. and Hurd, A.J., Appl. Opt., 26, 2236, (1987).Google Scholar
2. Cummins, H.Z. and Swinney, H.L., in Progress in Optics, VIII, edited by Wolf, E., (North-Holland), 1981.Google Scholar
3. Epstein, P.S., Phys. Rev., 23, 710, (1924).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Davies, C.N., Proc. Phys. Soc., 57, 259, (1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Knudsen, M. and Weber, S., Ann. Phys., Lpz., 36, 982, (1911).Google Scholar
6. Murata, H., J. Lightwave, LT–4, (8), 1026, (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Kaiser, J.F. and Reed, W.A., Rev. Sci. Inst., 48, 1447, (1977).Google Scholar
8. Scarborough, J.B., Numerical Mathematical Analysis, 5th ed., (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1962), pp. 539–545.Google Scholar
9. Vargaftik, N.B.,Tables on the Thermophysical Properties of Liquids and Gases, (Wiley and Sons., New York, 1975).Google Scholar
10. Ulrich, G.D. and Riehl, J.W., J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 87, (1), (1982).Google Scholar
11. Bacon, J.F., Hasapis, A.A., Wholley, J.W. Jr., Phys. and Chem. of Glasses, 3, 90, (1960).Google Scholar