Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:33:35.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parametric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Michael T. Mocela
Affiliation:
Freoie®Products Laboratory, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE 19898
Mary W. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE 19898
Herbert H. Sawin
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
Kenneth D. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

The analysis of plasma etching processes has been explored for the etching of polysilicon films with CF3Cl/Ar discharges. The etching rate is well fit as a function of the macroscopic plasma parameters (power input, pressure, and composition) using Response Surface Methodology. The parametric expression obtained can be used to examine the sensitivity of the process to the operating conditions, and to optimize the process. The parametric expression also permits comparison of the experimental data with physically meaningful kinetic models.

The Response Surface Method allows characterization of a wide parameter space with few experiments. The design of the experimental set is critical to the success of the parametric fit. The parametric expression must account for interactions between parameters, and the expected curvature of the response surface will dictate the required number of data points.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Edelson, D. and Flamm, D.L., J. Appl. Phys., 56, 1522 (1984), and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Box, G.E., Hunter, W.G., and Hunter, J.S., “Statistics for Experimenters”, Wiley, New York (1978).Google Scholar
3. DuPont de Nemours and Co., E.I., “Strategy of Experimentation”, Applied Technology, FWFP, Wilmington, DE (1975).Google Scholar
4. Klein, D.G. and Kupper, L.L., “Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods”, Duxbury, MA (1978).Google Scholar
5. Bergeron, S.F. and Duncan, B.F., Solid State Technology 25 (8), 99 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Sawin, H., Yokozeki, A., and Owens, A.J., following paper in this volume.Google Scholar
7. Leahy, M.F., Proc. Electrochem. Society 82–6, 176 (1982).Google Scholar
8. The statistical analysis and fitting routines used are software developed and supported by Du Pont's Applied Statistics Group.Google Scholar