Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:10:39.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxygen Implanted Layers in Silicon Electrical and Microstructural Characterization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C. J. Varker
Affiliation:
Motorola Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Phoenix, AZ 85008Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281
S. R. Wilson
Affiliation:
Motorola Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Phoenix, AZ 85008Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281
S. S. Chan
Affiliation:
Motorola Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Phoenix, AZ 85008Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281
J. D. Whitfield
Affiliation:
Motorola Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Phoenix, AZ 85008Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281
Get access

Abstract

We report on an investigation of ‘buried’ oxygen implants formed by 0+ implantation at 400 KeV and 3.5 MeV into p-type CZ (100) wafers with a dopant density NA 1015 cm−3. Peak concentrations of 1 × 1019 cm−3 to 2 × 1020 cm−3. were investigated. Test devices were fabricated on implanted and annealed wafers using conventional wafer processing. For the 400 keV implants, a 4 µm epitaxial buffer layer was grown subsequent to the 0+ implant. For a dose of 3 × 1015 cm−2 the lifetime reduction ratio for the effective generation lifetime τg at the implant peak is greater than 103 relative to an unimplanted region where τg = 150 µS. C-V and SRP profiles show evidence for oxygen donor compensation. TEM analysis reveals a well defined layer at 1 µm with respect to the original implant surface containing a relatively high density of small precipitates and dislocation loops. DLTS measurements on diodes reveal 2 electron traps designated as E1 and E2. The trap energy ∆E and capture cross section σ are (EC-ET)1 = 0.41 ± 0.020 eV and (EC-ET)2 = 0.22 ± 0.030 eV with σ 1019 cm-3. The estimated trap density NT for the dominant trap is 8.2 × 1013 cm−3 for a calculated peak 0+ implant concentration of 6.8 × 1019 cm−3. The values of ∆E are in good agreement with values for unimplanted CZ wafers subjected to 2-step precipitation anneals. The experimental results provide direct evidence that ion implantation provides an effective method of introducing atomic oxygen in silicon at concentration exceeding its solid solubility during processing to produce a buried low lifetime region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Varker, C. J., Whitfield, J. D. and Fejes, P. L. in Silicon Processing, edited by Gupta, D. C. (ASTM STP 804, 1983) p. 369.Google Scholar
2. Varker, C. J., Whitfield, J. D. and Fejes, P. L., Materials Research Society Proceedings, edited by Mahajan, S. and Corbett, S. W. (North-Holland, 1983) p. 187.Google Scholar
3. Otsuka, H., Watanabe, K., Nishimura, H. and Iwai, H., IEEE, EDL-3, No. 7, 182, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kappert, H. F., Sixt, G. and Schwuttke, G. H., Phys. Stat. Sol.(a), 52, 463 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Mogro-Campero, A. and R Love, P., J. Electrochem. Soc., 655, Mar. (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Miller, G. L., Lang, D. V. and Kimerling, L. C., Annual Review of Material Science, edited by Huggins, R. A., Bube, R. H. and Roberts, R. W. (Annual Reviews, Inc. 1977) p. 341.Google Scholar
7. Gibbons, J. F., Johnson, W. S. and Mylroie, S. W., Projected Range Statistics, (Academic Press, 1975).Google Scholar
8. Chan, S. S., Varker, C. J., Whitfield, J. D. and Carpenter, R. W., presented MRS Spring Meeting (1985), Symposium B Poster Session, to be published in Symposia Proceedings.Google Scholar