Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:46:13.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxidative Alteration of Spent Fuel in a Silica-Rich Environment: SEM/AEM Investigation and Geochemical Modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Yifeng Wang
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, 4100 National Parks Highway, Carlsbad, New Mexico88220. E-mail: [email protected]
Huifang Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico87131. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Correctly identifying the possible alteration products and accurately predicting their occurrence in a repository-relevant environment are the key for source-term calculations in a repository performance assessment. Uraninite in uranium deposits has long been used as a natural analog to spent fuel in a repository because of their chemical and structural similarity. In this paper, a SEM/AEM investigation has been conducted on a partially alterated uraninite sample from a uranium ore deposit of Shinkolobwe of Congo. The mineral formation sequences were identified: uraninite → uranyl hydrates → uranyl silicates → Ca-uranyl silicates or uraninite → uranyl silicates → Ca-uranyl silicates. Reaction-path calculations were conducted for the oxidative dissolution of spent fuel in a representative Yucca Mountain groundwater. The predicted sequence is in general consistent with the SEM observations. The calculations also show that uranium carbonate minerals are unlikely to become major solubility-controlling mineral phases in a Yucca Mountain environment. Some discrepancies between model predictions and field observations are observed. Those discrepancies may result from poorly constrained thermodynamic data for uranyl silicate minerals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Finch, R. J. and Ewing, R. C., J. Nucl. Mater., 190, p. 133156 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Fayek, M., Kyser, T. K., Ewing, R. C., and Miller, M. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 465, p. 12011207 (1997).Google Scholar
3 Xu, H. and Wang, Y., J. Nucl. Mater., 265, p. 117123 (1999).Google Scholar
4 Wolery, T. J., EQ3NR, A Computer Program for Geochemical Aqueous Speciation-Solubility Calculations: Theoretical Manual, User's Guide, and Related Documentation (Version 7.0). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-MA-110662 PT III (1992).Google Scholar
5 Wolery, T. J. and Daveler, S. A., EQ6, A Computer Program for Reaction Path Modeling of Aqueous Geochemical Systems: Theoretical Manual, User's Guide, and Related Documentation (Version 7.0). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-MA-I 10662PTIV (1992).Google Scholar
6 Harrer, J. E., Carley, J. F., Isherwood, W. F., and Raber, E., Report of Committee to Review the Use of J-13 Well Water in Nevada Nuclear waste Storage Investigations.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCID-21867 (1990)Google Scholar