Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:05:54.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orthopedic implants from bioactive rosette nanotubes/poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)/nano-hydroxyapatite composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2012

Linlin Sun
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Brown University, 182 Hope Street, Providence, RI 02912 USA
Lijie Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, George Washington University, 801 22nd Street, Washington, DC, USA
Usha D. Hemraz
Affiliation:
National Institute for Nanotechnology and Departments of Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, 11421 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M9, Canada.
Hicham Fenniri*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Nanotechnology and Departments of Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, 11421 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M9, Canada.
Thomas J. Webster*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Brown University, 182 Hope Street, Providence, RI 02912 USA Department of Orthopaedics, Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903 USA
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
*Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

With multifunctionality and nanoscale dimensions, self-assembled rosette nanotubes (RNTs) exhibit unique biological and mechanical properties, making them promising to serve as a new generation of implants. Synthetic twin G^C base features the hydrogen bonding arrays of both guanine and cytosine and has the ability to self-organize spontaneously into nanotubes with a 3.5 nm outer diameter, a 1.1 nm inner channel running the length of the nanotube which can reach several micrometers in length. In this study, a twin G^C motif functionalized with an aminobutyl side chain (referred to as TBL) was synthesized, assembled into bioactive RNTs and used along with poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) and hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles to prepare RNTs/HA/pHEMA composites for orthopedic applications. The properties of these composites was investigated, notably the solidification process, surface morphology, mechanical properties, and cytocompatibility properties. The RNTs assembled from TBL and HA nanoparticles were found to be effective towards increasing the bioactivity of the composites thus establishing the potential of TBL/HA/pHEMA composites as very promising injectable orthopedic implant materials.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Webster, T. J. Nanophase Ceramics: The Future Orthopedic and Dental Implant Material, Advances in Chemical Engineering vol. 27, Ying, J. Y., Ed.; New York: Academic, 125166, 2001.Google Scholar
2. Nath, S., Basu, B. Materials for orthopedic applications. Advanced biomaterials fundamentals, processing, and applications. Basu, B., Katti, D. S, Kumar, A., Eds., John Wiley & Sons, 2009, pp. 53100.Google Scholar
3. Fenniri, H.; Mathivanan, P.; Vidale, K. L.; Sherman, D. M.; Hallenga, K.; Wood, K. V.; Stowell, J. G. Helical Rosette Nanotubes: Design, Self-Assembly, and Characterization, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 38543855, 2001.Google Scholar
4. Fenniri, H.; Deng, B. L.; Ribbe, A. E.; Hallenga, K.; Jacob, J.; Thiyagarajan, P. Entropically Driven Self-assembly of Multichannel Rosette Nanotubes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 99, 6487–92, 2002.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, R. S.; Yamazaki, T.; Kovalenko, A.; Fenniri, H., Molecular Basis for Water–Promoted Supramolecular Chirality Inversion in Helical Rosette Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 57355743, 2007.Google Scholar
6. Moralez, J. G.; Raez, J.; Yamazaki, T.; Kishan, M. R.; Kovalenko, A.; Fenniri, H., Helical Rosette Nanotubes with Tunable Stability and Hierarchy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 83078309, 2005.Google Scholar
7. Song, S.; Chen, Y.; Yan, Z.; Fenniri, H.; Webster, T. J., Self-Assembled Rosette Nanotubes for Incorporating Hydrophobic Drugs in Physiological Environments. Int. J. Nanomed. 6, 101107, 2011.Google Scholar
8. Fine, E.; Zhang, L.; Fenniri, H.; Webster, T. J., Enhanced Endothelial Cell Functions on Helical Rosette Nanotubes Coated Titanium Vascular Stents. Int. J. Nanomed. 4, 9197, 2009.Google Scholar
9. Zhang, L.; Rakotondradany, F.; Myles, A. J.; Fenniri, H.; Webster, T. J., RGD-Modified Rosette Nanotubes–Hydrogel Composites for Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials 30, 13091320, 2009.Google Scholar
10. Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Rodriguez, J.; Fenniri, H.; Webster, T. J., Biomimetic Helical Rosette Nanotubes and Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Coatings on Titanium for Improving Orthopedic Implants. Int. J. Nanomed. 3, 323333, 2008.Google Scholar
11. Zhang, L.; Ramsaywack, S.; Webster, T. J., Enhanced Osteoblast Adhesion on Self-assembled Nanostructured Hydrogel Scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part A 4, 13531364, 2008.Google Scholar
12. Zhang, L.; Rakotondradany, F.; Myles, A.; Fenniri, H.; Webster, T. J. Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic Acid Modified Rosette Nanotube–Hydrogel Composites for Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials 30, 13091320, 2009.Google Scholar