Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:32:43.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orientation Relationships between BCC Deposits and FCC Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

David A. Smith ,
Armin Segmüller  and
A. R. Taranko
David A. Smith
Affiliation:
IBM Corporation, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 USA
Armin Segmüller
Affiliation:
IBM Corporation, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 USA
A. R. Taranko
Affiliation:
IBM Corporation, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 USA
Get access

Abstract

Oriented deposits are commonplace in vapor deposited films. The origins of this behavior are not always clear. Various bcc metals (Fe, Nb, Mo, Ta, Cr) have been deposited onto single crystal fcc substrates (Au, Ni, MgO, Si, NaCI) which were selected with the intention of varying the character of the substrate-deposit interaction. The resulting structures have been characterized by transmission electron microscopy and grazing incidence x-ray diffraction. The observed variants of the cube-cube and Nishiyama-Wassermann orientation relationship can be understood in terms of minimization of misfit except when there is a weak interaction between substrate and deposit.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 94: Symposium D – Initial Stages of Epitaxial Growth , 1987 , 127
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Grovenor, C.R.M., Sutton, A.P. and Smith, D.A., Scripta Met. 18, 939 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Venables, J., in Epitaxial Growth, edited by Matthews, J.W., (Academic Press, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
3. Christian, J.W., in Phase Transforniation in Metals and Alloys, (Pergamon, Oxford).Google Scholar
4. Aaronson, H.I., Laird, C. and Kinsman, K.L., in Phase Transformations, (ASM, Metals Park, 1970), p. 313.Google Scholar
5. See, for example, Gruenbaum, E., in Epitaxial Growth, edited by Matthews, J.W., (Academic Press, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
6. Clarke, D.R. and Stobbs, W.M., Metal. Sci. 8, 242 (1974).Google Scholar
7. Kurdjumov, G. and Sachs, G., Z. Phys. 64, 325 (1930).Google Scholar
8. Eizenberg, M., Smith, D.A., Heiblum, M. and Segmtuller, Armin, Appl. Phys. Letts. 49, 422 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Nishiyama, Z., Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. 23, 637 (1934).Google Scholar
10. Baker, R.G. and Nutting, J., in Precipitation Processes in Steel. Iron and Steel Institute, (Special Report No. 64, London, 1959), p. 1.Google Scholar
11. Smith, D.A., Wetzel, J.T. and Taranko, A.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 37, 77 (1985).Google Scholar