Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:35:31.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orientation Imaging of the Microstructure of Polycrystalline Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Brent L. Adams*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Provo, Utah 84602
Get access

Abstract

Recent developments, coupling the scanning electron microscope with image processing and crystallographic analysis, now make it possible to automatically index many thousands of lattice orientations exposed on section planes in polycrystalline materials. Backscattered Kikuchi diffraction patterns obtained from high-gain SIT and CCD cameras are analyzed using the Hough transformation (Cartesian coordinates - polar coordinates) in order to identify diffraction band widths and interplanar angles. From this basic information local lattice orientation can be determined. Information from raw data sets (in excess of 100,000 single orientations in some examples) can be used to construct orientation imaging micrographs which emphasize certain aspects of the exposed field of lattice orientations. Thus, features of the spatial placement of lattice orientation (including grain boundary misorientation, microtexture, and connectivity of the microstructure) are readily studied. In this paper these techniques are reviewed, and recent explorations of the connectivity of grain boundary misorientation structure are presented for an interesting nickel-chromium-iron alloy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Blackham, M. N., Alam, M. and Pashley, D. W., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A221, 224 (1953).Google Scholar
2. Venables, J. A. and Harland, C. J., Phil. Mag. 27, 1193 (1973).Google Scholar
3. Dingley, D. J. and Baba-Kishi, K., Scanning Electron Microscopy 2, 383 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Juul-Jensen, D. and Schmidt, N.-H. in Recrystallization ‘90, edited by Chandra, T. (The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, PA, 1991) p. 219.Google Scholar
5. Wright, S. I. and Adams, B. L., Metall. Trans. 24A, 759 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Lassen, N. C., Conradsen, K., and Juul-Jensen, D., Scanning Microscopy 6, 115 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Kunze, K., Wright, S. I., Adams, B. L. and Dingley, D. J. in Symposium on Microscale Textures of Materials, edited by Adams, B. L. and Weiland, H. (Textures and Microstructures 20, Gordon and Breach Publishers, Brussels, 1993) p. 41.Google Scholar
8. Hammermesh, M., Group Theory and its Application to Physical Problems, Addison Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1962) p. 29.Google Scholar
9. Adams, B. L. and Field, D. P., Metall. Trans. 23A, 2501 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Gotthardt, R., Hoschek, G., Reimold, O. and Haessner, F., Texture 1, 99 (1972).Google Scholar
11. Adams, B. L., Wright, S. I. and Kunze, K., Metall. Trans. 24A, 819 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Brandon, D. G., Acta metall. 14, 1479 (1966).Google Scholar