Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:37:34.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ordering in III/V Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

G.B. Stringfellow
G.B. Stringfellow*
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Get access

Abstract

Simple calculations using the delta-lattice-parameter (DLP) model indicate that the enthalpy of mixing is invariably larger than or equal to zero for III/V alloys, and increases with increasing difference in lattice constant for the constituent binary compounds. In terms of the regular solution model this suggests the occurrence of miscibility gaps. Solid phase immiscibility has indeed been observed in a number of systems. Nevertheless, such alloys can be grown by OMVPE, including the highly metastable alloys GaPSb and InPSb. Initially surprising was the occurrence of ordered structures in these same alloys. The regular solution model apparently specifically excludes immiscibility and ordering in the same system. However, when the positive enthalpy of mixing is due to strain energy effects, as in III/V alloys, Hume-Rothery recognized very early that such phenomena should be anticipated. This was later confirmed by detailed first principles calculations. In fact, the tendency for ordering is anticipated to increase as the difference in tetrahedral radii of the elements sharing a common sublattice increases. Thus, it is somewhat surprising that ordering was first observed in the AlGaAs system where Al and Ga have nearly equal sizes. Ordered structures have now been observed in several III/V alloy systems including the ternary systems GaAsSb and GalnP and the quaternaries GalnAsP, GalnAsSb, and AlGalnP. In this paper, ordering in other alloy systems such as GaPSb and InAsSb will be described. Surprisingly, no strong correlation between atomic size difference and the degree of ordering has been observed. Another unexpected observation is that the preferred ordered structure for most ternaries involves ordering along the {111}directions. Both first principles total energy and simple strain energy calculations indicate that such ordered structures are only slightly more stable than the disordered solid solution. Other ordered structures, including L10, where ordering occurs along the {100} directions, are considerably more stable. Both phenomena must be explained in terms of the surface kinetic processes occurring during epitaxial growth. Such an explanation is supported by the importance of kinetic parameters such as growth rate, temperature, and substrate orientation in determining both the degree of order and the specific ordered structures observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 163: Symposium G – Impurities, Defects and Diffusion in Semiconductors: Bulk and Layered Structures , 1989 , 893
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Phillips, J.C., Bonds and Bands in Semiconductors (Academic Press, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
2 Stringfellow, G.B., J. Crystal Growth 27 21 (1974).Google Scholar
3 Fedders, P.A. and Muller, M.W., J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 45 685 (1984).Google Scholar
4 Mikkelsen, J.C. and Boyce, J.B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1412 (1982).Google Scholar
5 Fukui, T., Japan. J. Appl. Phys 23 L208 (1984) and J. Appl. Phys. 57 5188 (1985).Google Scholar
6 Martins, J.L. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B30, 6217 (1984).Google Scholar
7 Chen, A.B. and Sher, A., Phys. Rev. B32, 3695 (1985).Google Scholar
8 Jou, M.J., Cherng, Y.T., Jen, H.R., and Stringfellow, G.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 549 (1988).Google Scholar
9 Cherng, M.J., Cohen, R.M., and Stringfellow, G.B., J. Electron. Mater. 13 799 (1984).Google Scholar
10 Jou, M.J., Cherng, Y.T., and Stringfellow, G.B., J. Appl. Phys. 64 1472 (1988).Google Scholar
11 Gokcen, N.A. Statistical Thermodynamics of Alloys (Plenum Press, New York, 1986) p. 118.Google Scholar
12 Jen, H.R., Cherng, M.J., and Stringfellow, G.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48 1603 (1986).Google Scholar
13 Swalin, R.A. Thermodynamics of Solids, (New York : John Wiley & Sons, 1972).Google Scholar
14 Hume-Rothery, W., Electrons, Atoms, Metals, and Alloys, 3rd Edition, (Dover, London, 1963), Chapter 39. The first edition was published in 1948.Google Scholar
15 Stringfellow, G.B., J. Crystal Growth 65 454 (1983).Google Scholar
16 Srivastava, G.P., Martins, J.L., and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B31, 2561 (1985).Google Scholar
17 Zunger, A. and Wood, D.M., J. Crystal Growth (to be published).Google Scholar
18 Kuan, T.S., Kuech, T.F., Wang, W.I., and Wilkie, E.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 201 (1985).Google Scholar
19 Jen, H.R., Jou, M.J., and Stringfellow, G.B. (unpublished results).Google Scholar
20 Jen, H.R., Jou, M.J., Cherng, Y.T., and Stringfellow, G.B., J. Cryst. Growth 85 175 (1987).Google Scholar
21 Murgatroyd, J., Norman, A.G., and Booker, G.R., Materials Research Society Spring Meeting, Palo Alto, CA, April, 1986; Y.E. Ihm, N. Otsuka, J. Klem, and H. Morkoc, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 2013 .Google Scholar
22 Gomyo, A., Suzuki, T., Kobayashi, K., Kawata, S., Hino, I., and Yuasa, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48 1603 (1987); S. McKernan, B.C. DeCooman, C.B. Carter, D.P. Bour, and J.R. Shealy, J. Mater. Res. 3 406 (1988); J.P. Goral, M.M. Al-Jassim, J.M. Olson, and A. Kibbler, Epitaxy of Semiconductor Layered Structures, (Materials Research Society, Pittsburg, 1988), pp. 583–589.Google Scholar
23 Norman, A.G., Mallard, R.E., Murgatroyd, I.J., Booker, G.R., Moore, A.H., and Scott, M.D., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 87 77 (1987).Google Scholar
24 Shahid, M.A. and Mahajan, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. B 38 1344 (1988).Google Scholar
25 Zunger, A. (private communication).Google Scholar
26 Jen, H.R., Ma, K.Y., and Stringfellow, G.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54 1154 (1989).Google Scholar
27 Gomyo, A., Suzuki, T., and Iijima, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 2645 (1988).Google Scholar
28 Asai, H., J. Crystal Growth 80 425 (1987).Google Scholar
29 Suzuki, T., Gomyo, A., and Ijima, S., J. Crystal Growth, 93 396 (1989).Google Scholar
30 Nakayama, H. and Fujita, H., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 79 289 (1986).Google Scholar
31 Kuan, T.S., Wang, W.I., and Wilkie, E.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 51 (1987).Google Scholar
32 Jen, H.R., Cherng, M.J., and Stringfellow, G.B., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 83 159 (1987).Google Scholar
33 Ueda, O., Takikawa, M., Komeno, J., and Umebu, I., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26 L1824 (1987).Google Scholar
34 Jen, H.R., Cao, D.S., and Stringfellow, G.B., Appl. Phys. Lett., (submitted).Google Scholar
35 Jen, H.R., Jou, M.J., and Stringfellow, G.B. (unpublished results).Google Scholar
36 Jen, H.R., Cherng, M.J., Jou, M.J., and Stringfellow, G.B., in Ternary and Multinary Compounds, ed. Deb, S.K. and Zunger, A. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburg, 1987) p. 353.Google Scholar