Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:13:56.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Order-Disorder Phenomena in Complex Alloys: The Case of A15-Based Substitutional Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

P.E.A. Turchi  and
A. Finel
P.E.A. Turchi
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, L-268, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94550
A. Finel
Affiliation:
ONERA, BP72, 92322 Chatillon Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

We first discuss the applicability of the Generalized Perturbation Method to the study of ordering phenomena in complex alloys for which stability properties are electronically driven. In particular, according to previous work, it is recalled that a 3D-generalized Ising model is appropriate to address the problem of configurational order in A 15-based substitutional alloys. A ground state analysis of this model, including 1st, 2nd and weak 3rd and 7th pair interactions, generates two new ordered states at the composition A5B3 and A7B, apart from the well known A3B configuration. The stability of these predicted configurations is examined as a function of temperature and concentration by means of standard statistical techniques. The results are discussed in relation with the experimental situation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 186: Symposium I – Alloy Phase Stability and Design , 1990 , 101
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sinha, A. K., Progr. in Mater. Sci, 15. 79, 1973.Google Scholar
2. Kuo, K. M., Ye, Y. Q. and Li, D. X., J. of Mater. Sci., 21 2597, 1986.Google Scholar
3. Shoemaker, D. P. and Shoemaker, C. B. in ”Introduction to Quasicrystals”, ed. by Jaric, M. V. (Academic Press Inc.) vol. 1, 1, 1988.Google Scholar
4. Schechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D. and Cahn, J. W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 53, 1951, 1984.Google Scholar
5. Audier, M. and Guyot, P. in “Extended Icosahedral Structures”, ed. by Jaric, M. V. and Gratias, D. (Academic Press Inc.), voL 3, 1, 1989.Google Scholar
6. Turchi, P.E.A., Treglia, G. and Ducastelle, F., J. Phys., Fl3 2543, 1983.Google Scholar
7. Ducastelle, F. and Gautier, F., J. Phys., F6 2039, 1976.Google Scholar
8. Kikuchi, R., Phys. Rev., 81 988, 1951. J. M. Sanchez, F. Ducastelle and D. Gratias, Physica, 121A, 334, 1984.Google Scholar
9. Binder, K., “Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics” in Topics in Current Physics, ed. by Binder, K. (Springer Veriag, Berlin), vol. 7, 1, 1986.Google Scholar
10. Finel, A., These de Doctorat d'Etat es Sciences Physiques, University Paris VI, 1987 (unpublished).Google Scholar
11. Turchi, P.E.A. and Fiel, A., to be published.Google Scholar