Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:58:50.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimizing in vivo Assessment of Nano/bio Interactions to Guide Safer Material Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2011

Robert. L. Tanguay
Affiliation:
Environmental and Molecular Toxicology and the Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnologies Institute and the Safer Nanomaterials and Nanomanufacturing Initiative, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.
Lisa Truong
Affiliation:
Environmental and Molecular Toxicology and the Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnologies Institute and the Safer Nanomaterials and Nanomanufacturing Initiative, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.
Get access

Abstract

The rapid rate of discovery and development in the nanotechnology field will undoubtedly increase both human and environmental exposures to engineered nanomaterials. Whether these exposures pose a significant risk remains uncertain. Despite recent collective progress there remain gaps in our understanding of the nanomaterials physiochemical properties that drive or dictate biological responses. The development and implementation of rapid relevant and efficient testing strategies to assess these emerging materials prior to large-scale exposures could help advance this exciting field. I present a powerful approach that utilizes a dynamic in vivo zebrafish embryonic assay to rapidly define the biological responses to nanomaterial exposures. Early developmental life stages are often uniquely sensitive to environmental insults, due in part to the enormous changes in cellular differentiation, proliferation and migration required to form the required cell types, tissues and organs. Molecular signaling underlies all of these processes. Most toxic responses result from disruption of proper molecular signaling, thus, early developmental life stages are perhaps the ideal life stage to determine if nanomaterials perturb normal biological pathways. Through automation and rapid throughput approaches, a systematic and iterative strategy has been deployed to help elucidate the nanomaterials properties that drive biological responses.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Furgeson, D. and Fako, V., Zebrafish as a correlative and predictive model for assessing biomaterial nanotoxicity. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2009. 61: p. 478–486.Google Scholar
2.Barbazuk, W.B., et al. , The syntenic relationship of the zebrafish and human genomes. Genome Res, 2000. 10(9): p. 1351–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Harper, S.L., et al. , Proactively designing nanomaterials to enhance performance and minimise hazard. International Journal of Nanotechnology, 2008. 5(1): p. 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Truong, L., et al. , Differential Stability of Lead Sulfide Nanoparticles Influences Biological Responses in Embryonic Zebrafish. Archives of Toxicology, In Press.Google Scholar
5.Truong, L., Harper, S.L., and Tanguay, R., Evaluation of embryotoxicity using the zebrafish model. 1 ed. Drug Safety Evaluation, ed. Gautier, J.-C.. Vol. 691. 2011: Humana Press. 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Usenko, C.Y., Harper, S.L., and Tanguay, R.L., In vivo evaluation of carbon fullerene toxicity using embryonic zebrafish. Carbon N Y, 2007. 45(9): p. 1891–1898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed