Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:02:23.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of Ohmic Contacts on Lattice-Matched and Pseudomorphic AllnAs/InGaAs/InP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. Van Hove
Affiliation:
1MEC, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
T. Skrabka
Affiliation:
1MEC, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
H. Bender
Affiliation:
1MEC, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
W. De Raedt
Affiliation:
1MEC, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
M. Van Rossum
Affiliation:
1MEC, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Y. Baeyens
Affiliation:
KUL, ESAT-TELEMIC, Kardinaal Mercierlaan 94, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Ohmic contacts are optimized on δ-doped lattice-matched (x=0.53) and pseudomorphic (x=0.80) lno.53Gao.47As/Alo.52Ino.48As/InxGa1-xAs/AI0.52ln0.48As layers grown on InP by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). The layers are characterized by temperature-dependent Hall measurements (4-300 K) and Shubnikov-de Haas measurements at 1.2 K. Lowest specific transfer resistance (< 0.1 O.mm) is obtained with a Ni/AuGe/Ni/Au metal sequence alloyed at 280 °C for 1 min. The influence of the Ni content in the metallization is studied and AuGe layers evaporated from the eutectic composition (Au:Ge, 88:12 weight %) are compared with successively evaporated Au and Ge layers. It is shown that the resulting contact resistance is not very sensitive to changes in these parameters. The solid state reactions involved are studied by sputter Auger depth profiling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Berentz, J., Microwave Journal, August 1993, 113.Google Scholar
2 Nguyen, L.D., Brown, A.S., Thompson, M.A. and Jelloian, M., IEEE Trans. El. Dev., 39, 2007 (1993).Google Scholar
3 Zwicknagl, P., Mukherjee, S.D., Jones, W.L., Lee, H., Capani, P.M., Griem, T., Berry, J.D., Rathbun, L. and Eastman, L.F., Proc. 11th Int, Symp GaAs and Related Compounds, edited de Cremoux, B. (Institute of Physics, London, 1985), p.581.Google Scholar
4 Hong, W.P., Seo, K.S., Bhattacharya, P.K. and Lee, H., IEEE El. Dev. Lett., 7, 320 (1986).Google Scholar
5 Reeves, G.K. and Harrison, H.B., IEEE El. Dev. Lett., 3, 111 (1982).Google Scholar
6 Kuan, T.S., Batson, P.E., Jackson, T.N., Rupprecht, H. and Wilkie, E.L., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 6952 (1983).Google Scholar
7 Baeyens, Y., Skrabka, T., Van Hove, M., De Raedt, W., Nauwelaers, B. and Van Rossum, M., Proc. ESSDERC 93, edited Borel, J. (Editions Frontieres, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France), p. 753.Google Scholar