Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:15:34.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimization of Biosensing Microcantilever Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Xuan Zhang ,
Mo Yang  and
Cengiz S. Ozkan
Xuan Zhang
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Mo Yang
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Cengiz S. Ozkan
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Get access

Abstract

Optimization of piezoresistive microcantilevers for biosensing applications has been studied using finite element analysis. Models have been described for predicting the static behavior of cantilevers with elastic and piezoresistive layers for analyte-receptor binding. The high-sensitivity cantilevers can be used to detect changes in surface stress due to the binding and hybridization of biomolecules. Chemo-mechanical binding forces have been analyzed to understand the issues of saturation over the cantilever surface. The introduction of stress concentration regions during cantilever fabrication has also been discussed which enhances the detection sensitivity through increased surface stress.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 773: Symposium N – Biomicroelectromechanical Systems (BioMEMS) , 2003 , N6.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Thundat, D. Allison, D. P., Warmack, R. J. Stretched DNA structures observed with atomic force microscopy. Nucleic Acids Research 22(20), 4224–8 (1994)Google Scholar
2. Hansen, K, Ji, H.F., Wu, G., Datar, R., Cote, R., Majumdar, A., Thundat, T., Cantilever-based Optical Deflection Assay for Discrimination of DNA Single Nucleotide Mismatches. Analytical Chemistry (in press).Google Scholar
3. Raiteri, R., Nelles, G., Butt, H.J., Knoll, W. & Skladal, P. Sensing of biological substances based on the bending of microfabricated cantilevers. Sensors and Actuators B 61, 213–21 (1999)Google Scholar
4. Jensenius, H, Thaysen, J, Rasmussen, A, Veje, H L, Hansen, O, and Boisen, A. A mircrocantilever-based alcohol vapor sensor-application and response model. Applied Physics Letters, 76(18), 2615–2617 (2000)Google Scholar
5. Hansen, G, Mortensen, M W, Anderson, J, Ulstrop, J, Kuhle, A, Garnaes, J, and Boisen, A Stress formation during self-assembly of alkanethiols on differently pre-treated gold surfaces. Probe microscope, 2, 139–14 (2001)Google Scholar
6. Bashir, R, Gupta, A, GW, Neudeck, McElfresh, M, Gomez, R. On the design of piezoresistive silicon cantilevers with stress concentration regions for scanning probe microscopy applications. Journal of Micromechanics & Microengineering, 10(4), 483–491 (2000)Google Scholar
7. Bauer, P, Hecht, B, Rossel, C. Piezoresistive cantilevers as optical sensors for scanning near-field microscopy. Elsevier. Ultramicroscopy, 61(1-4), 127–130 (1995)Google Scholar
8. Brugger, J, RA, Buser, NF, de Rooij. Micromachined atomic force microprobe with ntegrated capacitive read-out. Journal of Micromechanics & Microengineering, 2(3), 218–220 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Dragoman, D, Dragoman, M. Terahertz field characterization using Fabry-Perot-like cantilevers. Applied Physics Letters, 79(5), 581–583 (2001)Google Scholar
10. Grabiec, P, Gotszalk, T, Radojewski, J, Edinger, K, Abedinov, N, IW, Rangelow. SNOM/AFM microprobe integrated with piezoresistive cantilever beam for multifunctional surface analysis. Microelectronic Engineering, 61-62, 981–986 (2002)Google Scholar
11. Kassegne, S., Madou, J.M., Whitten, R., Zoval, J., Mather, E., Sarkar, K., Hodko, D., Maity, S. Design Issues in SOI-Based High-Sensitivity Piezoresistive Cantilever Devices Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, CA, March 17-21 (2002)Google Scholar
12. Harley, J. A. and Kenny, T. W.. High-Sensitivity Cantilevers Under 1000A Thick. Applied Physical Letters, 75(2), 289–291 (1999)Google Scholar
13. Chang, K. C. Hammer, D. A. The Forward Rate of Binding of Surface-Tethered Reactants: Effect of Relative Motion between Two Surfaces. Biophysical Journal, 76, 1280–1292 (1999)Google Scholar
14. Ramakrishnan, A. and Sadana, A. A Predictive Approach using Fractal Analysis for Analyte-Receptor Binding and Dissociation Kinetics for Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor Applications, Journal of interface and Colloid Science, 229, 628–640 (2000)Google Scholar
15. Pritchard, W. F., Davis, P. F., Derafshi, Z., Polacek, D. C., Tsoa, R., Dull, R. O., Jones, S. A. and Giddens, D. P. Effects of Wall Shear Stress and Fluid Recirculation on the Localization of circulating Monocytes in a Three Dimensional flow model, Journal of Biomechanics, 28, 1459–146 (1995)Google Scholar
16. Marc Madou, Fundamentals of Microfabrication. CRC Press, 156–158 (1997)Google Scholar