Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:52:42.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optically Induced Paramagnetic Defects in PbTiO3 Single Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

W.L. Warren
Affiliation:
Glass and Electronic Ceramics Department, Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185
B.A. Tuttle
Affiliation:
Glass and Electronic Ceramics Department, Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185
B.N. Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Materials Research Laboratory, and Beckman InstituteUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Y. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Materials Research Laboratory, and Beckman InstituteUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
D.A. Payne
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Materials Research Laboratory, and Beckman InstituteUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access

Abstract

Optical excitations for trivalent platinum (5d7, t6e) and trivalent Pb (6s1) ions in lead titanate single crystals have been observed for the first time by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). The g and hyperfine coupling, A, tensors of Pt+3 defects were found to be axial: gil∥ = 1.938, g⊥ = 2.478, A∥ = 0.0164 cm−1, and A⊥ = 0.0324 cm−1. Analysis of the EPR spectra by crystal field theory indicates that the Pt+3 ions are in tetragonally distorted (elongated) octahedral sites, strongly suggesting that they substitute for the central Ti+4 ions in the perovskite lattice. Axially symmetric Fe+3 impurities were also observed in the crystals, and they also appear to substitute for the Ti+4 cation. Identification of Pb+3 in these single crystals further shows that holes trapped at Pb+2 ions are an inherent feature of Pb-based perovskite ferroelectrics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Possenride, E., Schirmer, O.F., Donnerberg, H.J., Godefroy, G., and Maillard, A., Ferroelectrics, 92, 245 (1989).Google Scholar
2) Gainon, D.J.A., Phys. Rev., 134, A1300 (1964).Google Scholar
3) Possenriede, E., Schirmer, O.F., Albers, J., and Godefroy, G., Ferroelectrics, 107, 313 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4) Kirkpatrick, E.S., Muller, K.A., and Rubins, R.S., Phys. Rev., 135 A86 (1964).Google Scholar
5) Molak, A., and Wojcki, K., Ferroelectrics, 125, 349 (1992).Google Scholar
6) Hennings, D., and Pomplun, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 57, 527 (1974).Google Scholar
7) Warren, W.L., Tuttle, B.A., McWhorter, P.J., Rong, F.C., and Poindexter, E.H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 63 (1993).Google Scholar
8) Sun, B.N., Huang, Y., and Payne, D.A., J. Crystal Growth, submitted.Google Scholar
9) Cotton, F.A. and Wilkinson, G., “Advanced Inorganic Chemistry,” (John Wiley and Sons, NY, 1988) p. 1387.Google Scholar
10) The tetragonal distortion may arise from the Jahn-Teller effect.Google Scholar
11) Abragram, A., and Bleaney, B., Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Transition Ions (Dover Publications, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
12) Wertz, J.E., and Bohon, J.R., Electron Spin Resonance (Chapman and Hall, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
13) Sroubek, Z., Zdansky, K., and Simanek, E., Phys. Status Solidi, 3, K1 (1963).Google Scholar
14) Tippins, H.H., Phys. Rev. 160, 343 (1967). Equations (2) and (3) ignore the effects of covalency.Google Scholar
15) These g-tensor relationships do not uniquely support the d7 assignment; they are consistent with it.Google Scholar
16) Warren, W.L., Tuttle, B.A., Sun, B.N., Huang, Y., and Payne, D.A., to be submitted.Google Scholar
17) Warren, W.L., Tuttle, B.A., Schwartz, R.W., Hammetter, W.F., Goodnow, D.C., Evans, J.T., and Bullington, J.A., these proceedings.Google Scholar