Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:23:42.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optical Response of Electron-Hole Plasma in Surface Excited Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

A. Forchel ,
H. Schweizer ,
B. Laurich ,
G. Tränkle  and
G. Mahler
A. Forchel
Affiliation:
Physikalisches Institut, Teil 4, Universität Stuttgart
H. Schweizer
Affiliation:
Physikalisches Institut, Teil 4, Universität Stuttgart
B. Laurich
Affiliation:
Physikalisches Institut, Teil 4, Universität Stuttgart
G. Tränkle
Affiliation:
Physikalisches Institut, Teil 4, Universität Stuttgart
G. Mahler
Affiliation:
Institut für Theoretische Physik, Teil, Universität Stuttgart Pfaffenwaldring 57, D–7000 Stuttgart–80, Germany
Get access

Abstract

A unified approach is presented which reconciles contradictory results obtained in earlier studies of optical spectra of inhomogeneous electronic systems in semiconductors: A consistent analysis of the optical data implies strong deviations from quasi-equilibrium in the carrier distributions. The non-equilibrium nature of the plasma is confirmed by a Mott-transition based study of the plasma transport.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 23 , 1983 , 209
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc., Vol.13, Part I, Edit.: Narayan, J., Brown, W.L., Lemons, R.A., North-Holland, New York-Amsterdam-Oxford.Google Scholar
2.Mahler, G., Forchel, A., Helv. Phys. Act. 56, 875 (1983).Google Scholar
3.Wautelet, M., Van Vechten, J.A., Phys. Rev. B23, 5551 (1981).Google Scholar
4.Hildebrand, O., Göbel, E.O., Romanek, K.M., Weber, H., Mahler, G., Phys. Rev. B17, 4775 (1978);Google Scholar
Arya, K. and Hanke, W., Sol. State Commun., 33, 739 (1980).Google Scholar
5.Klingshirn, C., Haug, H., Phys. Rep. 70, 315 (1981) and references therein.Google Scholar
6.Forchel, A., Laurich, B., Schmid, W., Pilkuhn, M.H., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., Suppl. A 49, 487 (1980).Google Scholar
7.Rice, T.M., in Solid State Physics, p.1, Suppl.32, Edit.: Seitz, F., Turnbull, D., Ehrenreich, H. (Academic Press New York 1977).Google Scholar
8.Reinecke, T.L., Forchel, A., Schweizer, H., Laurich, B., Hangleiter, A., Wagner, J. and Schmid, W., Physica 117B&118B, 315 (1983).Google Scholar
9.Fröhlich, H., Proc. Roy. Soc. A 188, 521 (1947);Google Scholar
Fröhlich, H., Paranjape, B.V., Proc. Phys. Soc. B 69, 21 (1956).Google Scholar
10.Bernard, M.G.A., Duraffourg, G., phys. stat. sol. 1, 699 (1961);Google Scholar
Lasher, G., Stern, F., Phys.Rev. A133, 553 (1964).Google Scholar
11.Leheny, R.F., Shah, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 871 (1976).Google Scholar
12.Göbel, E.O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 24, 492 (1974).Google Scholar
13.Vashista, P., Kalia, R.K., Phys.Rev. B 25, 6492 (1982).Google Scholar
14.Mott, N.F., “Metal-Insulator Transitions”, (Barnes and Noble, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
15.Schweizer, H., Forchel, A., Hangleiter, A., Schmitt-Rink, S., Löwenau, J.P., and Haug, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 698 (1983).Google Scholar